Sarah L. Gales
|
October 9, 2002 |
I am writing in support of audible signals and tactile warnings at pedestrian
crossings. I believe such accommodations would offer safety and ease in travel
for blind, visually impaired, the elderly, and children who need to cross busy
streets. As a blind pedestrian who has used both a cane and a guide dog I see no
disadvantages to providing these accommodations. Often traffic is intermittent
or a traveler does not have the skills to read traffic and cross safely. Some
individuals have not yet received instruction with a cane or guide dog and are
at a disadvantage when attempting to travel independently. Curb ramps have
helped wheelchair users and have also benefited the general public. I am quite
certain that tactile warnings and audible signals would have the same positive
results.
I thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sarah L. Gales
index
previous comment
next comment