Speedier NIH Review of Research Applications Planned
NIH/CSR Pilot Study for New Investigators Begins Early 2006
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) today announced a pilot effort to significantly
shorten its peer reviews of research grant applications — so scientists
can get on with their research sooner, to the public’s benefit. This pilot rose
from a growing concern that the current grant review process takes too long and
is hindering the careers of promising researchers and the advancement of science
and health.
The pilot will help one of the most promising but vulnerable groups of researchers:
new investigators applying for their first major NIH grant, an R01 grant. R01
grants totaling about $10 billion support many of the best biomedical researchers
at universities and medical centers across the country.
"This pilot illustrates our efforts for optimizing all facets of the research
review and funding process across NIH. I am particularly pleased that the pilot
phase will be focused on new investigators who are the most vulnerable in times
of budgetary constraints and often do not have the resources to withstand long
review cycles," said NIH Director, Elias Zerhouni, M.D. "Shortened review cycles
will benefit researchers and scientific institutions nationwide — and the
public awaiting medical advances."
The new director of the Center for Scientific Review, Toni Scarpa, M.D., Ph.D.,
added, “The scientific world moves fast, and we must keep up with it. We plan
to use new electronic and management tools while preserving the rigor and fairness
of NIH peer review, so we can identify the most promising medical research more
rapidly. Our goal is to reduce the grant review process by half.”
NIH’s Center for Scientific Review (CSR) will initiate the pilot in February
in 40 of its scientific review panels, offering quicker reviews to new investigators
who need to resubmit revised applications for their first R01 grant. This shortened
process and delayed resubmission deadlines will allow researchers able to readily
address reviewer concerns to revise and resubmit their applications for the very
next review cycle, or more than four months earlier than before.
CSR’s process currently takes six months and involves over 15,000 outside scientific
experts. Their resulting evaluations are then sent to the NIH Institutes and
Centers that fund grants for a second review, which usually takes three additional
months. Outside experts on their advisory councils make final recommendations
on which proposals may best address NIH goals and public health needs — to
advance medical knowledge, dietary and life-style preventive measures, vaccines,
therapies and cures. The individual Institute and Center Directors make their
final funding decisions based on the assessments and recommendations that come
out of the two-tiered review process.
The pilot program was devised by CSR and a Trans-NIH Committee to Shorten the
Review Cycle. This committee included representatives from the NIH Institutes/Centers
and the Office of Extramural Research. The plan for the pilot was accepted by
NIH’s Extramural Activities Working Group, which represents all the Institutes
and Centers, at the end of October and was presented to a joint meeting of the
NIH Review Policy Committee and the NIH Extramural Program Management Committee
this month.
Eileen Bradley, D.Sc., Chief of CSR’s Surgical Sciences, Biomedical Imaging
and Bioengineering Integrated Review Group, chaired the Trans-NIH Committee to
Shorten the Review Cycle.
To interview NIH’s CSR Director Scarpa, please contact the CSR press office
at 301-435-1111.
Details of the proposed pilot study have been posted in the NIH Guide to Grants
and Contracts: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-06-013.html
The Center for Scientific Review organizes the peer review groups that evaluate
the majority of grant applications submitted to the National Institutes of
Health. CSR recruits over 15,000 outside scientific experts each year for its
review groups. These scientific “peers” volunteer their free time to evaluate
applications and then, typically, meet to discuss and score them. (They get
travel expenses and a small honorarium for these meetings.) CSR also receives
all NIH and many Public Health Service grant applications — about 80,000
a year — and assigns them to the appropriate NIH Institutes and Centers
and PHS agencies. CSR’s primary goal is to see that NIH applications receive
fair, independent, expert, and timely reviews that are free from inappropriate
influences so NIH can fund the most promising research. For more information,
visit http://www.csr.nih.gov.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) — The Nation's Medical Research
Agency — includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of
the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. It is the primary Federal
agency for conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical
research, and it investigates the causes, treatments, and cures for both common
and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit http://www.nih.gov. |