This document is available in three formats: this web page (for browsing content), PDF (comparable to original document formatting), and WordPerfect. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

Return to Report

APPENDIX F

Cited Cases and Supporting Documents in Report

A

Addamax Corp. v. Open Software Foundation, Inc., 152 F.3d 48 (1st Cir. 1998).
Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc., 486 U.S. 492 (1988).
American Society of Mechanical Engineers v. Hydrolevel Corp., 456 U.S. 556 (1982).
Andrx Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Kroger Co., 543 U.S. 939 (2004), denying cert. to In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litigation, 332 F.3d 896 (2003).

  • Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae, Andrx, 543 U.S. 939 (No. 03-779), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2004/2pet/6invit/ 2003-0779.pet.ami.inv.pdf.

Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co., 440 U.S. 257 (1979).
Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp., 472 U.S. 585 (1985).
Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America, Inc., 897 F.2d 1572, 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1990).

B

Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Davis Co., 181 F.2d 550 (4th Cir. 1950).
Bayer AG v. Housey Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 228 F. Supp. 2d 467 (D. Del. 2002).
Bement v. National Harrow Co., 186 U.S. 70 (1902).
Blue Cross & Blue Shield United v. Marshfield Clinic, 65 F.3d 1406 (7th Cir. 1995).
Boggild v. Kenner Products, 776 F.2d 1315 (6th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 (1986).
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 441 U.S. 1 (1979).
Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc., No. CIV A 05-3350 MLC, 2006 WL 2528545 (D.N.J. Aug. 31, 2006), appeal docketed, No. 06-4292 (3d Cir. Oct. 4, 2006).
Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U.S. 29 (1964).

C

CSU, L.L.C. v. Xerox Corp., 531 U.S. 1143 (2001), denying cert. to 203 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2000).

  • Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae, CSU, 531 U.S. 1143 (No. 00-62), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/2pet/6invit/2000-0062. pet.ami.inv.pdf.

Carpet Seaming Tape Licensing Corp. v. Best Seam Inc., 616 F.2d 1133 (9th Cir. 1980).
Chemical Products Technologies, LLC v. Monsanto Co., No. 4:01-4384-12 (D.S.C. Nov. 13, 2001) (Complaint and Jury Demand).
Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231 (1918).
Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide Corp. 370 U.S. 690 (1962).
Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752 (1984).
Cutter Laboratories, Inc. v. Lyophile-Cryochem Corp., 179 F.2d 80 (9th Cir. 1949).

D

Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp., 36 F.3d 1147 (1st Cir. 1994).
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co., 448 U.S. 176 (1980).
Dehydrating Process Co. v. A.O. Smith Corp., 292 F.2d 653 (1st Cir. 1961).
In re Dell, 121 F.T.C. 616 (1996).

  • Complaint, In re Dell, 121 F.T.C. at 616-18 (No. C-3658), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/decisions/vol121.htm.

E

ESS Technology, Inc. v. PC-Tel, Inc., No. C-99-20292 RMW, 2001 WL 1891713 (N.D. Cal. 2001).
Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961).
eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 126 S. Ct. 1837 (2006).

  • Brief for the United States as Amicus Curaie Supporting Respondent, eBay, 126 S. Ct. 1837 (No. 05-130), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2005/ 3mer/1ami/2005-0130.mer.ami.pdf.

Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United States, 309 U.S. 436 (1940).

F

Fox Motors, Inc. v. Mazda Distributors (Gulf), Inc., 806 F.2d 953 (10th Cir. 1986).

G

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. U.S. Plywood Corp., 318 F. Supp. 1116 (S.D.N.Y. 1970).
Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. v. Nokia, Inc., 416 F. Supp. 2d 525 (E.D. Tex. 2006).
Grid Systems Corp. v. Tex. Instruments Inc., 771 F. Supp. 1033 (N.D. Cal. 1991).

H

Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States, 323 U.S. 386 (1945).
Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co., 77 F. 288 (6th Cir. 1896).
Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc., 441 F. Supp. 2d 1066 (N.D. Cal. 2006).

I

Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 126 S. Ct. 1281 (2006).

  • Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Illinois Tool, 126 S. Ct. 1281 (No. 04-1329), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2005/3mer/1ami/2004-1329.mer.ami.pdf.

Image Technical Services, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 125 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 1997).
Independent Ink, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 396 F.3d 1342 (Fed Cir. 2005), rev'd, 126 S. Ct. 1281 (2006).
In re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation, 203 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2000).
In re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation, No. MDL-1021 (D. Kan. Jan. 8, 1999) (Order).
In re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation, 989 F. Supp. 1131 (D. Kan. 1997).
In re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation, 964 F. Supp. 1479 (D. Kan. 1997).
Industrial Promotion Co. v. Versa Products, Inc., 467 N.W.2d 168 (Wis. Ct. App. 1991).
Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp., 195 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392 (1947).

J

Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2 (1984).

K

Kartell v. Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc., 749 F.2d 922 (1st Cir. 1984).
Khan v. State Oil Co., 93 F.3d 1358 (7th Cir. 1996), vacated, 522 U.S. 3 (1997).
King v. Anthony Pools, Inc., 202 F. Supp. 426 (S.D. Cal. 1962).
Kobe v. Dempsey Pump Co., 198 F.2d 416 (10th Cir. 1952).

L

Lear v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653 (1969).

M

MCA Television Ltd. v. Public Interest Corp., 171 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 1999).
Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co. v. Cinram International, Inc., 299 F. Supp. 2d 370 (D. Del. 2004).
Matthew Bender & Co. v. West Publishing Co., 158 F.3d 693 (2d Cir. 1998).

  • Brief for Amicus Curiae United States of America in Support of Appellees, Matthew Bender & Co., 158 F.3d 693 (No. 97-7430), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f1100/1191.pdf.

McDermott, Inc. v. AmClyde, 511 U.S. 202 (1994).
MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., 127 S. Ct. 764 (2007).

  • Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner, MedImmune, 127 S. Ct. 764 (No. 05-608), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2005/3mer/1ami/2005-0608.mer.ami.pdf.

Meehan v. PPG Industries, Inc., 802 F.2d 881 (7th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1091 (1987).
Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co., 320 U.S. 661 (1944).
Micron Technology, Inc. v. Rambus Inc., 189 F. Supp. 2d 201 (D. Del. 2002).
Miller Insituform, Inc. v. Insituform of North America, Inc., 830 F.2d 606 (6th Cir. 1987).
Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co., 243 U.S. 502 (1917).
Mozart Co. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., 833 F.2d 1342 (9th Cir. 1987).

N

National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 (1984).
National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States, 435 U.S. 679 (1978).
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1 (1958).

P

Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc., 525 U.S. 55 (1998).

  • Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Respondent, Pfaff, 525 U.S. 55 (No. 97-1130), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f1800/1836.pdf.

Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Mestre, 701 F.2d 1365 (11th Cir. 1983).
Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., 508 U.S. 49 (1993).

R

Radiant Burners, Inc. v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co., 364 U.S. 656 (1961).
In re Rambus, Inc., No. 9302 (F.T.C. July 31, 2006), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/adjpro/d9302/060802commissionopinion.pdf.
In re Rambus Inc., No. 9302 (F.T.C. 2002).

  • Complaint, Rambus, No. 9302, available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/adjpro/d9302/020618admincmp.pdf.

Rambus Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG, 164 F. Supp. 2d 743 (E.D. Va. 2001), rev'd in part, 318 F.3d 1081 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

S

SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 645 F.2d 1195 (2d Cir. 1981).
Samsung Electronics Co. v. Rambus Inc., 439 F. Supp. 2d 524 (E.D. Va. 2006).
Scheiber v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc., 293 F.3d 1014 (7th Cir. 2002).
Schor v. Abbott Laboratories, 457 F.3d 608 (7th Cir. 2006).
Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of California, 377 U.S. 13 (1964).
Sony Electronics, Inc. v. Soundview Technologies, Inc., 157 F. Supp. 2d 180 (D. Conn. 2001).
Southco, Inc. v. Kanebridge Corp. (Southco II), 390 F.3d 276 (3d Cir. 2004) (en banc), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 336 (2005).

  • Brief Amicus Curiae of the United States of America in Support of Appellee Kanebridge Corp., Southco II, 390 F.3d 276 (No. 02-1243), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f201000/201034.pdf.

Southco, Inc. v. Kanebridge Corp. ( Southco I), 258 F.3d 148 (3d Cir. 2001).

  • Brief Amicus Curiae of the United States of America Urging Reversal in Support of Appellant Kanebridge Corp., Southco I, 258 F.3d 148 (No. 00-1102), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f4900/4953.pdf.

Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc., 476 U.S. 409 (1986).
Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 337 U.S. 293 (1949).
Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 283 U.S. 163 (1931).
Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 226 U.S. 20 (1912).
In re Summit Technology, Inc., 127 F.T.C. 208 (1999), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/decisions/docs/Volume127.pdf.

  • Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment, Summit Tech,
    No. 9286, available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/1998/08/d09286ana.htm.
  • Complaint, Summit, 127 F.T.C. at 208 (No. 9286).
  • Decision and Order, Summit, 127 F.T.C. at 217 (No. 9286).
  • Order Reopening the Record and Dismissing the Complaint, In re VISX, Inc., No. 9286 (F.T.C. Feb. 7, 2001), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2001/02/ summitvisxorder.htm.

Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Proxim Inc., No. Civ. 01-801-SLR, 2004 WL 1770290 (D. Del. July 28, 2004).

T

Townshend v. Rockwell International Corp., 2000-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶ 72,890, 2000 WL 433505 (N.D. Cal. 2000).

U

USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505 (7th Cir. 1982).
U.S. Philips Corp. v. International Trade Commission, 424 F.3d 1179 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
In re Union Oil Co. of California, No. 9305 (F.T.C. Nov. 25, 2003), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/11/031126unionoil.pdf, rev'd, No. 9305 (F.T.C. July 7, 2004), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/adjpro/d9305/040706commissionopinion.pdf.

  • Complaint, Unocal, No. 9305 (F.T.C. Mar. 4, 2003), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/03/unocalcp.htm.

United Mine Workers v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 (1965).
United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 (1919).
Unites States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563 (1966).
United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F. Supp. 545 (E.D. Pa. 1960), aff'd per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 (1961).
United States v. Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287 (1948).
United States v. Loew's, Inc., 371 U.S. 38 (1962).
United States v. Masonite Corp., 316 U.S. 265 (1942).
United States v. Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (en banc).
United States v. Mircosoft Corp., 87 F. Supp. 2d 30 (D.D.C. 2000), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 253 F.3d 34.

  • Complaint, Microsoft 87 F. Supp. 2d 30 (No. 98-1232), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f1700/1763.pdf.

United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc., 342 U.S. 371 (1952).
United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 334 U.S. 131 (1948).
United States v. Pilkington plc, No. 94-345, 1994-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶ 70,842, 1994 WL 750645 (D. Ariz. Dec. 22, 1994).

  • Complaint, Pilkington plc, No. 94-345, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f0000/0014.pdf.
  • United States v. Pilkington plc and Pilkington Holdings Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement, 59 Fed. Reg. 30,604 (June 14, 1994), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f220800/220860.pdf, http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f220800/220861.pdf.

United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150 (1940).
United States v. Singer Manufacturing Co., 374 U.S. 174 (1963).
United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364 (1948).
United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co. of New Jersey, 247 U.S. 32 (1918).
United States v. Univis Lens Co., 316 U.S. 241 (1942).
United States v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 648 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1981).

V

In re VISX, Inc., 127 F.T.C. 236 (1999), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/decisions/docs/ Volume127.pdf.

  • Decision and Order, VISX, 127 F.T.C. at 236 (No. 9286).

Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, 540 U.S. 398 (2004).

  • Brief for the United States and the Federal Trade Commission as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioner, Trinko, 540 U.S. 398 (No. 02-682), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f201000/201048.pdf.

Vogel v. American Society of Appraisers, 744 F.2d 598 (7th Cir. 1984).

W

Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965).
Wells Real Estate, Inc. v. Greater Lowell Board of Realtors, 850 F.2d 803 (1st Cir. 1988).

Z

Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 395 U.S. 100 (1969).