Assessing Breeding Populations of Ducks by Ground Counts
Table 9
Table 9. Comparison of 1958 Kindersley census results utilizing various population comonents and sex ratio correction factors.
Mallard | Pintail | Widgeon | Shoveler | Gadwall | Blue-winged teal | |
Census date in May | 10 | 10 | 21 | 21 | 31 | 31 |
A. Indicated breeding population from counts including pairs and lone drakes only. |
90 | 81 | 55 | 40 | 24 | 30 |
Per cent of estimate D using two components, pairs and lone drakes. | (52) | (54) | (134) | (138) | (96) | (111) |
B. Indicated breeding population from counts including pairs, lone males, grouped males, GFAC, and ARF. |
191 | 161 | 55 | 40 | 24 | 34 |
C. Mean indicated breeding population from five census dates (Table 12) 95% confidence interval |
194 ±12.9 |
168 ±13.5 |
44 ±12.4 |
34 ±4.6 |
28 ±7.0 |
32 ±10.2 |
Mean sex ratio corrected population from C and Table 3 | 173 | 149 | 41 | 29 | 25 | 27 |
Previous Section -- Table 8
Return to Contents
Next Section -- Table 10