I am writing to urge the Access Board not to
require audible traffic signals at every intersection in the final regulations
as proposed. This requirement is not necessary as most streets can be crossed
safely without these audible cues. When they are not needed, it is an
unreasonable expense on cities and communities; this money can be spent in
more prudent ways such as in repairing broken sidewalks. Such requirements
should be limited to complex street designs or when the traffic flow varies
according to the lane. Even in these situations any audible traffic signals
should be activated by the pedestrian and/or have a tactile panel.
This approach not only avoids requiring cities and
communities to expend valuable dollars when not necessary but actually
preserves a safer environment. If as a blind person I approach an intersection
that has audible traffic signals, I actually find it much more difficult to
hear the traffic flow as well. I
suppose that this would not be a problem if I
could be assured that every driver is going to follow the traffic laws to the
letter; however, we know that this is not the case. Today's pedestrians, blind
or sighted, have to be alert. Being able to hear the car that might run a red
light or turn when it shouldn't is very important. I simply cannot put my fate
in the hands of the irresponsible drivers. I must insist on my right to be
able to hear the traffic flow and strongly oppose any arbitrary rule or
regulation that requires audible traffic signals at all intersections
controlled by a traffic light.Shelia B.
Wright
index
next comment
