Christine Mores

October 5, 2002

I am writing this not only as a blind individual, but also as the mother of a blind mentally retarded daughter. I am also am a member of The National Federation of the Blind.

I do not want audible traffic signs or detachable warning devices placed at any intersection. My reasons for this is the following: If a blind or visually impaired person has the proper mobility and orientation training they have learned to listen for the flow of traffic. The need for beeping, chipping or talking signs are invalid. Not only that but if you have received the proper training your surroundings will give you the warnings you need. As a blind individual I pride myself in being able to go where I want and when I want without the help of signs or warnings beeping at me. My daughter who just two years ago attended and graduated from the Colorado Center for the Blind on more than occasion said she hated the talking traffic signs there as it became confusing during the heavy traffic periods to hear which sign was beeping. She also travels independently.

When you have busy traffic the noise overrides any beeping or chirping sound and then one can easily confuse where they are suppose to be going or doing at that time. Audible signs also do nothing to help the deaf and blind individual.

Although most blind individuals prefer to be independent there are times when we do need assistance. The best way to do that if anything most be done other than asking for assistance when needed would be to put vibrating poles in at the intersections that are the most traffic on it.

Thank you for taking the time to read this.

Sincerely,
Christine Mores