Bernie R. Vinther

October 28, 2002

About 20 years ago I was a licensed driver. Now, I am totally blind and a
person who has experianced being hit trying to cross streets with standard but not accessible signals. I was seriously injured, going over the hood of a vehicle traveling at 25 mph. Fortunately, my dog guide received less serious injuries, and we still travel independently about town.

However, even before the accident, I felt the need for accessable pedestrian signals, and I am (fortunately living) proof of that need. I also feel STRONGLY that the Access Board should accept/adopt the proposed regulations from the Public rights of Way Advisory committee involving the use of detectable warnings and accessible pedestrian signals. I have personally experienced the benefits of these devices. They cause no harm or disadvantage to those who don't need or choose not to use them. But, They are reasonable and absolutely necessary by all persons in my situation who desire to cross streets safely at controled intersections.

Sincerely,

Bernie R. Vinther