Keith Tonge' 
October 28, 2002


Dear Acccess Board.

I am writing to voice my opposition to the mandated installation of audible traffic signals and truncated domes.

From my perspective as a visually impaired individual and my interaction with other blind and visually impaired individuals, I see very little benefit in installing audible traffic signals. A person having basic mobility skills has no problem determining when it is safe to cross a street.

In addition audible traffic signals can often be more confusing thatn helpful, especially in congested city areas where there are echos or where it is too noisey to accurately determine when it is safe to cross.

I feel that the tens of thousands of dollars used to create these particular accomodations would be much better used in providing more oreientation and mobility training.

I am four-square behind efforts to aid individualls who have disabilities to compete with their non-disabled counterparts, but given limited resources I think that these investments should be strategically targeted toward helping people maintain their dignity and independence.

Whatever your decision in this matter, I applaud your efforts in this regard and sincerely hope that you continue to consider the opinion of those you server as you move forward in your important work.

Sincerely,

Keith Tonge'

left arrow index    left arrow previous comment   bullet   next comment right arrow