![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Previous Message |
Next Message Previous in Topic | Next in Topic Previous by Same Author | Next by Same Author Previous Page (August 2003) | Back to Main IMAGEJ Page | | ![]()
Reply
| Post a New Message |
Join or Leave IMAGEJ, or Change Options
|
Search | ![]()
Chronologically |
Most Recent First |
Wrap Text (Proportional Font) |
Don't Wrap Text (Non-proportional Font) | ![]() |
Content-Language: en Priority: normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:41:24 +1000 Reply-To: ImageJ Interest Group <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ImageJ Interest Group <[log in to unmask]> From: Miss Marita Goodwin <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Quantitation of pixel intensitiesHi Bryan, thanks for replying so promptly. Of course, the mean*area will give me exactly what I want. Thanks. With the division though, if I divide an image that is very bright, it represents the total fluorscence of the cell (the average pixel intensity is say around 200) and I divide that by the same image but one that represents a slice of the cell, therefore is a lot less bright (say average pixel intensity is around 10), I still get basically a two toned (black and white) image, I've lost all the grey scale. The clincher was when I divided the same image by itself (therefore each pixel in the resulting image should equal one) I should have got either a totally white or a totally black image(whatever one was supposed to equal). However, this wasn't the case. I still got a mixed black and white image that looked exactly how my sample images looked. It didn't seem to matter what I divided, I got the same resulting image. It just had me a bit baffled. Anyway, I should get the data I need from the pixel mean*area so thanks for you help. Regards, Marita
![]() |
![]() Center for Information Technology National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland 20892 301 594 6248 (v) 301 496 8294 (TDD) Comments and Assistance Accessibility ![]() |