Previous Message | Next Message Previous in Topic | Next in Topic Previous by Same Author | Next by Same Author Previous Page (August 2003) | Back to Main IMAGEJ Page
	Reply | Post a New Message | Join or Leave IMAGEJ, or Change Options | Search
	Chronologically | Most Recent First | Wrap Text (Proportional Font) | Don't Wrap Text (Non-proportional Font)

References: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Message-ID:  <p04320400bb7036924aa1@[192.168.1.4]>
Date:         Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:04:46 -0400
Reply-To:     ImageJ Interest Group <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       ImageJ Interest Group <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Bill Christens-Barry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Correction: no problem deconvolving with Process>FFT>FD Math...
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>

I want to correct a mistaken msg I left earlier today. In that msg, I
described getting a 180 degree rotated result using  the "Deconvolve"
operation of the new Process>FFT>FD Math... command. Upon rechecking
this, I've found that this great new addition to ImageJ works
*correctly*.

I must have had one of the settings wrong when I generated the
supposed (cited) problem. My guess is that I had used the "correlate"
operation, and not the "Convolve" operation, when I composed the
image that I used as input for the subsequent "Deconvolve" operation.

Sorry for any confusion I may have sewn.

Bill Christens-Barry

Center for Information Technology National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland 20892 301 594 6248 (v) 301 496 8294 (TDD) Comments and Assistance Accessibility