Previous Message | Next Message Previous in Topic | Next in Topic Previous by Same Author | Next by Same Author Previous Page (August 2008) | Back to Main IMAGEJ Page
	Reply | Post a New Message | Join or Leave IMAGEJ, or Change Options | Search
	Chronologically | Most Recent First | Wrap Text (Proportional Font) | Don't Wrap Text (Non-proportional Font)

Approved-By: [log in to unmask]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
References: <000d01c8fb87$becf1be0$423434c1@lumaq3>
            <[log in to unmask]>
            <000101c901d3$c3d2d030$423434c1@lumaq3>
            <[log in to unmask]>
            <[log in to unmask]>
            <[log in to unmask]>
            <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:  <[log in to unmask]>
Date:         Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:35:12 +0200
Reply-To:     ImageJ Interest Group <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       ImageJ Interest Group <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Christian Lutz <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Developer Papers
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>

Hello,

Thank you for you help. Now, I got some perspektive how everything  
fits together.
And I will work with it some time.

best wishes
Christian




Am 20.08.2008 um 11:49 schrieb Albert Cardona:

> Hi Christian,,
>
>
>
>>>> - Is there a way to access any kind of version control / or is  
>>>> the only access via downloading last stable version code?
>>>> ( currently, read access would be enough )
>>>
>>>
>>> We have setup one: ImageJA at http://repo.or.cz/w/imageja.git/ ,  
>>> which is perhaps best used as a submodule of fiji  (web: http://pacific.mpi-cbg.de/ 
>>>    and repository: http://pacific.mpi-cbg.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=fiji.git;a=summary 
>>>  )
>>
>> So what would you recommend?, Fiji repository or ImageJA repository  
>> for developing ImageJ? I saw that Wayne merged his code into the  
>> ImageJA repo.
>> Are there any major differences between ImageJA and ImageJ (except  
>> the applet) on the desktop Version?
>> I think Fiji isn't the right place for us, because it is more  
>> designed for the end-user of imagej and not for the developer of it.
>> What is your opinion?
>
>
>
>
> ImageJA has its own git source code repository. Fiji has a separate  
> one.
> Then, inside Fiji, ImageJA's git repository is registered as a  
> submodule, like a dependency.
>
> Tinkering with ImageJ's source code is easiest with ImageJA's git  
> repository: see for example the wiki page on topic branches:
>
> http://pacific.mpi-cbg.de/wiki/index.php/Git_topic_branches
>
> You'll realize ImageJA has a lot of topic branches: we experiment  
> with it all the time. See the full list of pushed branches at the  
> bottom of this page, where it says "heads":
>
> http://repo.or.cz/w/imageja.git/
>
> For example, the head named "fiji" is a derivative branch, always  
> synchronized with the master branch, which we use as the kernel for  
> Fiji.
> Using git you can easily diff both branches. The main differences  
> are at the Menus.java class, which we have flexibilized. Now we can  
> insert plugin menu items anywhere in the menus from a plugins.config  
> file.
> There are ZERO fundamental differences between ImageJ and ImageJA on  
> the desktop.
>
> As for general development: I do not use Eclipse, neither NetBeans.  
> I use shell+screen+ViM. For those that use Eclipse, though, there  
> are git plugins for it. I don't know about the state of NetBeans in  
> relation to git.
>
> Fiji has been created to make ImageJ + plugins trivial for end users  
> (via self-contained packages, see http://pacific.mpi-cbg.de/wiki/index.php/Downloads 
>  ), while having a full source code repository (ImageJ + plugins)  
> available within a version control system, for best ease of  
> development. So Fiji targets both: users and developers.
>
> Albert
>
> -- 
> Albert Cardona
> http://www.mcdb.ucla.edu/Research/Hartenstein/acardona

Center for Information Technology National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland 20892 301 594 6248 (v) 301 496 8294 (TDD) Comments and Assistance Accessibility