![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Previous Message |
Next Message Previous in Topic | Next in Topic Previous by Same Author | Next by Same Author Previous Page (December 2007) | Back to Main IMAGEJ Page | | ![]()
Reply
| Post a New Message |
Join or Leave IMAGEJ, or Change Options
|
Search | ![]()
Chronologically |
Most Recent First |
Wrap Text (Proportional Font) |
Don't Wrap Text (Non-proportional Font) | ![]() |
Approved-By: [log in to unmask] User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) References: <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:41:47 +0000 Reply-To: ImageJ Interest Group <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ImageJ Interest Group <[log in to unmask]> From: Michael Doube <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Counting pixels above a certain grey value in a stack In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>You can do this with my macro: http://doube.org/macros.html#vfb Though you might have to hack it a bit to suit your system Cheers Mike Dimiter Prodanov wrote: > Even simpler. What you ask is basically the cumulative histogram. > So make a macro; get the histogram per slice in the > stack; sum up in an array > and voila - you have your profile of intensities in z direction. > > Cheers > > Dimiter Prodanov > -- Michael Doube BPhil BVSc MRCVS PhD Student Dental Institute Queen Mary, University of London New Rd London E1 1BB United Kingdom Phone +44 (0)20 7377 7000 ext 2681
![]() |
![]() Center for Information Technology National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland 20892 301 594 6248 (v) 301 496 8294 (TDD) Comments and Assistance Accessibility ![]() |