![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Previous Message |
Next Message Previous in Topic | Next in Topic Previous by Same Author | Next by Same Author Previous Page (December 2007) | Back to Main IMAGEJ Page | | ![]()
Reply
| Post a New Message |
Join or Leave IMAGEJ, or Change Options
|
Search | ![]()
Chronologically |
Most Recent First |
Wrap Text (Proportional Font) |
Don't Wrap Text (Non-proportional Font) | ![]() |
Approved-By: [log in to unmask] Thread-Index: Acg1zal8V5YLnsiPQ4+HjdX1z5LEtQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: <003601c835cd$a99ff760$de060a0a@hbarwoodxp> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:58:00 -0600 Reply-To: ImageJ Interest Group <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ImageJ Interest Group <[log in to unmask]> From: Henry Barwood <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Follow up questionI was unsubscribed to the list for two weeks because of a failure of the Troy server to allow e-mails. I'm re-posting my question, and apologize if anyone has already addressed it: I am collecting optical spectra from a device I built using a 640 X 480 pixel webcam as a sensing element. I convert them into spectrograms using ImageJ which works nicely; however, I need to produce a profile plot with nm instead of pixel labeling and I need to have the scale start at 380 nm instead of "0" pixels. Is there an easy way to do this, and then output the plot to a printable file? Any help or suggestions as to where to look to find an answer would be welcome. Thanks. Henry Barwood Associate Professor of Science, Earth Sciences Department of Math and Physics MSCX 312G Troy University Troy, Alabama hbarwood@troy.edu [log in to unmask]
![]() |
![]() Center for Information Technology National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland 20892 301 594 6248 (v) 301 496 8294 (TDD) Comments and Assistance Accessibility ![]() |