![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Previous Message |
Next Message Previous in Topic | Next in Topic Previous by Same Author | Next by Same Author Previous Page (May 2002) | Back to Main IMAGEJ Page | | ![]()
Reply
| Post a New Message |
Join or Leave IMAGEJ, or Change Options
|
Search | ![]()
Chronologically |
Most Recent First |
Wrap Text (Proportional Font) |
Don't Wrap Text (Non-proportional Font) | ![]() |
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]> Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 09:34:57 -0700 Reply-To: ImageJ Interest Group <[log in to unmask]> Sender: ImageJ Interest Group <[log in to unmask]> From: Rachel Bearon <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: batch processing of stacks and saving results In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>Thanks - this seems to work great now. I'm still on the steep part of the learning curve so all the suggestions are really helpful! Rachel On Thu, 23 May 2002, Bob Dougherty wrote: > Gregg, > > You're right, I botched the "path" . As you say, mixing macro calls and Java can be very confusing. Your version is also better in several other ways. Here is the example code with the additional step of clearing the measurements in between loops. > > I wrote a version that bypasses "Measurements..." and uses a MeasurementsWriter directly, but I'll just hang onto it unless it is needed to address Steven Drieve's question? > > Rachel, > > Obviously, you'll need to uncomment the IJ.run lines at the top to try these. > > Bob > > > > -- > Robert Dougherty > President, OptiNav, Inc. > (425) 467-1118 > [log in to unmask] > http://www.optinav.com > >
![]() |
![]() Center for Information Technology National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland 20892 301 594 6248 (v) 301 496 8294 (TDD) Comments and Assistance Accessibility ![]() |