Text Size: A+| A-| A   |   Text Only Site   |   Accessibility
dhs banner

Committees

_____________________________________________________

 

Steering Committee

Target population is children and youth, birth to 18, who have emotional and behavioral health problems and who touch at least two systems. This population includes children and youth who are at risk as well as those who already have a diagnosed problem.  

 

Charge

Develop a plan to finance and to provide accountability for statewide emotional and behavioral health services for children, youth and their families that reflect system of care values and wraparound principles. The finance and accountability structures should enable, encourage and provide incentives for:

 

1. Knowing the true cost of providing emotional and behavioral healthcare to children across systems

 

2. Tracking outcomes of system of care and wraparound implementation

 

3. Providing efficient, effective, and coordinated resources to meet child and family needs and to promote positive development

 

4. Planning that is individualized to fit specific children and their families and that emphasizes early intervention and community-based service and support approaches

 

The plan should specifically include the following:

 

(a) A multi-year action plan to implement necessary policy, statutory changes and federal waivers

 

(b) Strategies to address:

   o State and local financing

   o Local implementation and roll out

   o Culturally appropriate services

   o Measurement of service and finance outcomes

   o Coordination across and between state and local services

 

(c) Methods to overcome barriers

 

(d) Statewide vision and principles that are sensitive to Oregon’s diversity

 

Back to top

 

Finance Committee

 

Charge

Recommend approaches for sharing resources across child-serving systems to promote system of care principles and values. Focus of work: 

 

1. Describe current spending and utilization patterns across agencies at the state level; point out the types of resources expended by other payers. 

 

2. Make recommendations to better coordinate resources across all systems.

 

3. Identify mechanisms to maximize federal resources available to the state and local communities.

 

4. Recommend best means to ensure local accountability for services and resources to support those services.

 

5. Suggest match, cost sharing and coordination of resources at local level necessary to maximize all available resources. 

 

Back to top

 

Local Implementation Committee

 

Charge 

Develop recommendations to implement system-of-care approach statewide, across diversity of Oregon Communities. Specifically address:  

 

1. Local mechanism(s) for coordinating services and resources across systems.

 

2. Local accountability for outcomes for children and families.

 

3. Ways to roll out system-of-care approach to Oregon Communities.

 

4. Integrating system-of-care approach into the work of local child-serving systems. 

 

Back to top

 

Cultural Competency Committee

 

Charge

Recommend approaches for embedding cultural competent care into the statewide system of services and supports for children and their families. Focus of work: 

 

1. Develop a statement that describes culturally appropriate services in system of care context.

 

2. Design standards for culturally appropriate care and means to measure compliance.

 

3. Identify best practice examples of culturally competent services in system of care models.

 

4. Recommend ways to continually improve culturally appropriate care. 

 

Back to top

 

Data and Evaluation Committee

 

Charge

Recommend approaches to evaluating programmatic and financial outcomes of statewide system of care. Work to focus on: 

 

1. Core outcomes for children and families.

 

2. Core outcomes for financial utilization and coordination.

 

3. Ways to track data across agencies at state and local levels.

 

4. Implementation of system of care principles;

 

5. Evaluation of state and local resource coordination and resource allocation.

 

6. Implications(s) for Oregon Benchmarks and state/local outcome systems. 

 

 

 

Quick Links

Home
Committees 
Project Team
Scope of Work
Research and Information

Helpful Information

Glossary of Terms (PDF)
Governor's Executive Order (PDF)
Organizational Chart (PDF)
Ten Principles of the Wraparound Process (PDF)
Workplan for Wraparound Initiative (PDF)
Timeline for Wraparound Initiative (PDF)

 

 

Back to top

 
Page updated: September 21, 2007

Get Adobe Acrobat ReaderAdobe Reader is required to view PDF files. Click the "Get Adobe Reader" image to get a free download of the reader from Adobe.