VIA E-MAIL TO HEARINGCLERKS
Tennessee Division of Rehabilitation Services
Nashville, Tennessee 37248
April 1, 2004
The Honorable E. Clay Shaw,
Jr.
Chairman
Subcommittee on Social
Security
U.S. House of Representatives
1102 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC20515
Dear Chairman Shaw:
On March 18, 2004, the
Subcommittee on Social Security held a hearing on the Social Security
Administration’s Management of the Ticket to Work Program. The Division of
Rehabilitation Services (DRS), with Tennessee Department of Human Services, would
like to submit written comments for the hearing record in rebuttal to testimony
presented by Mr. Paul J. Seifert, with the Social Security Task
Force, Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities.
Staff Training on the
Ticket Program
Tennessee DRS State Office
staff has traveled the state training its field counselors on the Ticket to
Work Program. The agency also trains all new Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Counselors
on the Ticket to Work Program as part of its New Counselor’s Training. Additionally,
the agency often and regularly communicates to its staff updated and important
information on this subject.
Informing SSA
Beneficiaries of the Ticket Program
A couple of months before the
Ticket to Work Program was to be implemented in Tennessee, the agency sent out
thousands of letters to its SSI/SSDI clients informing them of the forthcoming
Ticket Program. The letter explained the program and pointed out that this new
program was soon to start up in Tennessee. Clients were told that they may be getting a
“ticket” to use to help enable them to get employment. Clients were told about
the options they would have in choosing service providers, as well about the
CDR benefit in using the Ticket.
The Agreement with
Employment Networks
The agency has a standard
Employment Network agreement that is applicable to all those ENs who wish to
partner with the agency. There are currently five such agreements in place in Tennessee. No
EN has voiced any concern to the State Office about the contents of this
Agreement.
According to the Ticket to
Work regulations, if an EN holds a ticket on an individual that they want to
refer to a state VR agency, they must first have an agreement in place with
that agency. The agency’s agreement with ENs allows these referrals to be made
under the ticket rules.
As partners under the
agreement, the Ticket Program lets the EN and the state VR agencies decide how
they wish to share the Ticket payments from SSA.
Tennessee’s agreement with their EN partners lets the state VR agency
recover monies it spends in serving the EN referrals. The money comes through
a percentage of the periodic payments the EN gets from SSA via the EN payment
system. This way, the EN always gets a portion of the SSA payment and the
state VR agency gets a portion up until the state VR agency recovers its actual
costs in serving the individual. The state VR agency receives no monies above
its actual costs.
A Possible Solution
Most state VR agencies across
the nation would possibly welcome the recommendation of the Adequacy of
Incentives Work Group -- i.e., that cost reimbursement be made to state VR
agencies separately from the Ticket Program, with the Ticket money going to ENs
serving the beneficiary. In his testimony, Mr. Seifert seems to support this
recommendation. This solution lets state VR agencies recover their costs and
lets ENs receive money via the Ticket Program.
Sincerely,
Carl Brown
Assistant Commissioner
|