November 6, 2002
Statement of Larry C. Bryant, South Carolina Vocational
Rehabilitation Department, West Columbia, South Carolina
Based on the hearing that took place on March 18, 2004 regarding the Social
Security Administration's (SSA’s) Management of the Ticket to Work Program, it is evident that the
concerns regarding the Ticket to Work program continue to escalate. The South
Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department believes that the successful
services that the state vocational rehabilitation departments are providing to social
security beneficiaries are being over looked due to the unresolved issued that
have resulted from the 1999 Ticket to Work and Self-sufficiency legislation. Therefore,
we feel that it is necessary to provide written documentation regarding the
positive services to social security beneficiaries that take place in South
Carolina.
Since the program’s inception in 1999, the South Carolina
Vocational Rehabilitation Department has actively supported the program. Our
agency has invested a significant number of resources to train our staff
regarding the ticket program and the impact that this program has on social security
beneficiaries who desire to obtain independence through employment. Not only
do we feel that our staff members should be educated about the ticket program,
we feel strongly that our clients should have a full understanding of the
program and work incentives that go along with it. Therefore, we request that
ALL of our applicants and existing clients in the VR program who are receiving
SSI and/or SSDI meet with a Benefit Specialist to discuss these issues. We encourage
this regardless of ticket “assignability.”
Our agency is especially proud of the relationship that we
have developed with our local Social Security offices. During the roll out
phase of the ticket program in our state, we invited Social Security staff to
attend and present at our ticket to work training sessions. Currently, we are
working closely with the Work Incentive Coordinator in our state to provide
additional ticket training in our 22 local offices located through the state.
We feel that this relationship with SSA exemplifies the importance that South
Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department places on providing services to
the social security beneficiaries of South Carolina.
We are also in the process of fostering a positive working
relationship with the Employment Networks that serve South Carolina. We feel
that it is necessary to develop an Employment Network (EN)/Vocational
Rehabilitation (VR) agreement that caters to the needs of
the client not to the needs of “reimbursement.” It is our intention to provide
the best services to social security beneficiaries as possible. Therefore, as
we establish agreements with Employment Networks, not only will they outline an
agreed method of payment, but most importantly shared service provisions. We
do not agree with a “take it our leave it, one size fits all” attitude toward
EN/VR agreements. Service provision is our number one priority. The
reimbursement that we receive is to supplement our services to social security
beneficiary, not to supplant these services. Again, our client’s needs and
employment objectives drive the services provided to them. We encourage input
from employment networks and other agencies regarding service provision for our
clients. I will say, however, that the negative attitude displayed by other
entities regarding Vocational Rehabilitation and Ticket to Work activities has
been discouraging.
As the Ticket to Work program continues to evolve, we feel
that it is imperative to continue obtaining input from all parties who have
been affected by this legislation. Resolutions to the issues surrounding the ticket
program need to occur quickly in order to maintain the highest quality of
service to social security beneficiaries.
|