NLM Gateway
A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health
Your Entrance to
Resources from the
National Library of Medicine
    Home      Term Finder      Limits/Settings      Search Details      History      My Locker        About      Help      FAQ    
Skip Navigation Side Barintended for web crawlers only

Projecting performance measures and costs of alternative HIV rapid test strategies.

Shields JM, Mwinga AZ, Nelson DB; International Conference on AIDS.

Int Conf AIDS. 2002 Jul 7-12; 14: abstract no. B10167.

CDC/GAP - Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of HIV Rapid Tests present testing protocol optimization challenges to researchers and program specialists. The number of possible protocols exceeds even the combinations of the available tests. The many calculations required to evaluate alternatives mitigate against making analytically based choices. Field evaluation should precede programmatic implementation, but a decision support tool may be used to short list possible protocols for in-country evaluation. METHODS: An Excel spreadsheet was prepared to facilitate short listing alternative protocols by providing protocol templates and a means of selecting tests from a user modifiable list to model a specific protocol. The user specifies conditions for the selected tests, inputs local performance parameters (or selects best, mid, or worst case published sensitivity and specificities), and stipulates estimated prevalence and number of persons to be tested. RESULTS: The spreadsheet performs Bayesian and other required statistical calculations to produce EXPECTED net protocol sensitivity and specificity, false negative and false positive counts, number of HIV tests of each type required for the protocol, total cost of tests used, and a measure of the protocol testing bias. During a discussion of the merits of introducing electronic readers at a planning meeting in Zambia, using the tool demonstrated no significant expected marginal benefit for cost, given prior local performance. CONCLUSIONS: This decision support tool has been useful in ad hoc modeling of selected rapid test strategies and quickly comparing their projected performance. It is flexible in that intermediate calculations and formulae are available for review and adaptation to special cases, and most researchers and program specialists can use spreadsheets. We expect the tool will be useful for those planning to implement new or evaluate existing HIV testing strategies.

Publication Types:
  • Meeting Abstracts
Keywords:
  • AIDS Vaccines
  • Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Evaluation Studies
  • HIV
  • HIV Antibodies
  • HIV Core Protein p24
  • HIV Infections
  • HIV Seropositivity
  • HIV Seroprevalence
  • Immunologic Techniques
  • Mass Screening
  • Prevalence
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Weights and Measures
  • Zambia
  • economics
  • immunology
Other ID:
  • GWAIDS0016906
UI: 102254404

From Meeting Abstracts




Contact Us
U.S. National Library of Medicine |  National Institutes of Health |  Health & Human Services
Privacy |  Copyright |  Accessibility |  Freedom of Information Act |  USA.gov