NLM Gateway
A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health
Your Entrance to
Resources from the
National Library of Medicine
    Home      Term Finder      Limits/Settings      Search Details      History      My Locker        About      Help      FAQ    
Skip Navigation Side Barintended for web crawlers only

Quality management for screening.

Williams DR, Jenkins C, Balmer S, Farrar H, Bowens A, Bruce E; International Society of Technology Assessment in Health Care. Meeting.

Annu Meet Int Soc Technol Assess Health Care Int Soc Technol Assess Health Care Meet. 1999; 15: 66.

OBJECTIVE/PURPOSE: To identify a strategic national framework for ensuring quality management of NHS screening programs, building on best practice in the breast and cervical screening programs. METHODS: The research consists of four elements: 1. a Workshop (on 23 July 1998) involving NHS Managers, clinicians, public health professionals, user group representatives, academics and others to identify key issues; 2. a search and review of the relevant literature in the UK and outside; 3. a written survey of UK District Directors of Public Health to identify existing local initiatives and opinions about the factors which facilitate or impede quality management of screening. 4. a series of qualitative telephone interviews with individuals involved in a range of roles in screening to give further information on the issues covered in the survey. RESULTS: The research is ongoing, and due to be completed at the end of March 1999. The results so far suggest that the following are key factors for the success of a national framework of quality management for screening program. Clear, explicit and streamlined accountability, management and performance assessment frameworks at national, region and local levels; a positive not blame culture, involving professional, staff and users in quality management; commissioning should be at health authority level or higher and screening units sufficiently large to allow development of expertise and meaningful monitoring; screening should be better integrated into mainstream NHS management processes, while maintaining a strategic, national direction; the media, public, users and professionals need much better information about the benefits and limitations of screening programmes; evidence based training for professionals in communication skills is very important; quality management of screening would be greatly improved by a user friendly, efficient IT system for program management and performance monitoring.

Publication Types:
  • Meeting Abstracts
Keywords:
  • Administrative Personnel
  • Health Personnel
  • Health Services Research
  • Mass Screening
  • Research
  • diagnosis
  • hsrmtgs
Other ID:
  • HTX/20602158
UI: 102193847

From Meeting Abstracts




Contact Us
U.S. National Library of Medicine |  National Institutes of Health |  Health & Human Services
Privacy |  Copyright |  Accessibility |  Freedom of Information Act |  USA.gov