Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry and IFCC Committee for standardization of markers of cardiac damage laboratory medicine practice guidelines: Analytical issues for biochemical markers of acute coronary syndromes.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s)/intervention(s) for which important revised regulatory and/or warning information has been released.

  • June 8, 2007, Troponin-I Immunoassay: Class I Recall of all lots of the Architect Stat Troponin-I Immunoassay. The assay may report falsely elevated or falsely decreased results at and near a low level, which may impact patient treatment.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Definitions of the weight of evidence (A-C) and the summary of indications (Classes I, II, IIa, IIb, III) are presented at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Note from the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) and the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): The Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines (LMPG) for utilization of biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes and heart failure have been divided into individual summaries. In addition to the current summary, the following are available:

Analytic Biomarker Issues

Recommendations: Analytical Aspects of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Biomarkers

All Class I

  1. Reference decision-limits should be established for each cardiac biomarker based on a population of normal, healthy individuals without a known history of heart disease (reference population). For cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and T (cTnT), as well as for creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) mass, the 99th percentile of the reference population should be the decision-limit for myocardial injury. The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly NCCLS) recommends a minimum of 120 individuals per group of healthy individuals for appropriate statistical determination of a normal reference limit cutoff. Sex-specific reference limits should be used in clinical practice for CK-MB mass. For myoglobin, the 97.5th percentile (with sex-specific reference limits) should be the decision-limit for myocardial injury. (Level of Evidence: B)
  2. One decision-limit, the 99th percentile, is recommended as the optimum cutoff for cTnI, cTnT, and CK-MB mass. ACS patients with cTnI and cTnT results above the decision-limit should be labeled as having myocardial injury and a high-risk profile. (Level of Evidence: B)
  3. Assays for cardiac biomarkers should strive for a total imprecision (% coefficient of variation [CV]) of <10% at the 99th percentile reference limit. Before introduction into clinical practice, cardiac biomarker assays must be characterized with respect to potential interferences, including rheumatoid factors, human anti-mouse antibodies, and heterophile antibodies. Pre-analytical and analytical assay characteristics should include biomarker stability (over time and across temperature ranges) for each acceptable specimen type used in clinical practice and identification of antibody/epitope recognition sites for each biomarker. Analytical and pre-analytical specifications developed by professional groups such as the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) should be followed. (Level of Evidence: C)
  4. Serum, plasma, and anticoagulated whole blood are acceptable specimens for the analysis of cardiac biomarkers. Choice of specimen must be based on sufficient evidence and the known characteristics of individual biomarker assays. (Level of Evidence: C)

Definitions:

Weight of Evidence

A - Data derived from multiple randomized or appropriately designed clinical trials that involved large numbers of patients

B - Data derived from a limited number of randomized or appropriately designed trials that involved small numbers of patients or from careful analyses of observational registries.

C - Expert Consensus was the primary basis for the recommendation

Summary of Indications

Class I: Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given laboratory procedure or treatment is useful and effective.

Class II: Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a laboratory procedure or treatment.

Class IIa: Weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy.

Class IIb: Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion.

Class III: Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the laboratory procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1999 Jul (revised 2007 Apr)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry - Professional Association

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) Writing Group Members: Fred S. Apple, Robert L. Jesse, L. Kristin Newby, Alan H.B. Wu, Robert H. Christenson

NACB Committee Members: Robert H. Christenson, Chair, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Fred S. Apple, Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Christopher P. Cannon, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Gary S. Francis, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Robert L. Jesse, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, USA; David A. Morrow, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; L. Kristin Newby, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Jan Ravkilde, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Alan B. Storrow, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; W. H. Wilson Tang, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Alan H. B. Wu, San Francisco General Hospital and University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Ad Hoc members of the committee for selected sections: Allan S. Jaffe, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Alan S. Maisel, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, USA; Mauro Panteghini, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

IFCC Committee On Standardization Of Markers Of Cardiac Damage (C-SMCD) members: Fred S. Apple, Chair; Robert H. Christenson; Allan S. Jaffe, Rochester, MN; Johannes Mair, Innsbruck, Austria; Jordi Ordonez-Llanos, Barcelona, Spain; Franca Pagani, Brecia, Italy; Mauro Panteghini, Milan, Italy; Jillian Tate, Brisbane, Australia; Alan H.B. Wu

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

GUIDELINE STATUS

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available from the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) Web site.

Print copies: National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry publications are available through American Association for Clinical Chemistry (AACC) Press. To make a purchase or request a catalog, contact AACC Customer Service at 202-857-0717 or custserv@aacc.org.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on March 11, 2008. The information was verified by the guideline developer on April 2, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry's (NACB) terms for reproduction of guidelines are posted with each set of guidelines.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo