Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Antenatal corticosteroids to prevent respiratory distress syndrome.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Antenatal corticosteroids to prevent respiratory distress syndrome. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG); 2004 Feb. 9 p. (Guideline; no. 7). [53 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

In addition to these evidence-based recommendations, the guideline development group also identifies points of best clinical practice in the original guideline document.

Levels of evidence (Ia-IV) and grading of recommendations (A-C) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Effectiveness of Antenatal Corticosteroid Therapy

A - Clinicians should offer antenatal corticosteroid treatment to women at risk of preterm delivery because antenatal corticosteroids are associated with a significant reduction in rates of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), neonatal death, and intraventricular haemorrhage.

B - Healthcare organisations and services should have policies and protocols in place for antenatal steroid treatment because the cost and duration of neonatal intensive care is reduced following corticosteroid therapy.

A - The optimal treatment-delivery interval for administration of antenatal corticosteroids is more than 24 hours but fewer than seven days after the start of treatment.

A - In preterm labour it is reasonable not to use tocolytic drugs, as there is no clear evidence that they improve outcome. However, clinicians should consider the use of short-term tocolysis if the few days gained can be put to good use, such as completing a course of corticosteroids, or in utero transfer.

A - If a tocolytic drug is used, ritodrine no longer seems to be the best choice. Atosiban or nifedipine appear to be preferable, as they have fewer adverse effects and seem to have comparable effectiveness. Atosiban is licensed for this usage in the United Kingdom (UK) but nifedipine is not.

Safety

A - Women may be advised that the use of a single course of antenatal corticosteroids does not appear to be associated with any significant maternal or fetal adverse effects.

Indications for Antenatal Corticosteroid Therapy

A - Every effort should be made to initiate antenatal corticosteroid therapy in women between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation with any of the following:

  • Threatened preterm labour
  • Antepartum haemorrhage
  • Preterm rupture of membranes
  • Any condition requiring elective preterm delivery

Between 35 to 36 weeks obstetricians might want to consider antenatal steroid use in any of the above conditions although the numbers needed to treat will increase significantly. [Evidence level Ia]

Antenatal education programmes or patient information leaflets should be considered to encourage early recognition of these conditions, in an effort to ensure early presentation and commencement of treatment. Maternity services should consider multidisciplinary staff training in providing information, including risk ratios, to women.

Dose and Route of Administration

B - Betamethasone is the steroid of choice to enhance lung maturation. Recommended therapy involves two doses of betamethasone 12 mg, given intramuscularly 24 hours apart.

Repeated Doses

A - If repeat courses of antenatal corticosteroids are contemplated then senior opinion should be sought as, at present, there is a lack of evidence to show significant benefit.

A - Obstetricians should consider enrolling their patients in randomised controlled trials if repeat corticosteroid therapy is contemplated.

Effectiveness of Thyrotrophin-Releasing Hormone

A - The use of thyrotrophin-releasing hormone is not recommended in combination with antenatal corticosteroids.

Definitions:

Grading of Recommendations:

Grade A - Requires at least one randomised controlled trial as part of a body of literature of overall good quality and consistency addressing the specific recommendation (evidence levels Ia, Ib)

Grade B - Requires the availability of well-conducted clinical studies but no randomised clinical trials on the topic of recommendations (evidence levels IIa, IIb, III)

Grade C - Requires evidence obtained from expert committee reports or opinions and/or clinical experience of respected authorities. Indicates an absence of directly applicable clinical studies of good quality (evidence level IV)

Levels of Evidence:

Ia: Evidence obtained from meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Ib: Evidence obtained from at least one randomised controlled trial

IIa: Evidence obtained from at least one well-designed controlled study without randomisation

IIb: Evidence obtained from at least one other type of well-designed quasi-experimental study

III: Evidence obtained from well-designed non-experimental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies, and case studies

IV: Evidence obtained from expert committee reports or opinions and/or clinical experience of respected authorities

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations" field).

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Antenatal corticosteroids to prevent respiratory distress syndrome. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG); 2004 Feb. 9 p. (Guideline; no. 7). [53 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1996 Apr (revised 2004 Feb)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Guidelines and Audit Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Committee Members: Professor Deirdre J Murphy, MRCOG (Chair); Lizzy Dijeh (Secretary); Ms Toni Belfield, Consumers' Representative; Professor P R Braude, FRCOG, Chairman, Scientific Advisory Committee; Mrs C Dhillon, Head of Clinical Governance and Standards Dept.; Dr Martin Dougherty, A. Director NCC-WCH; Miss L M M Duley, FRCOG, Chairman, Patient Information Subgroup; Mr Alan S Evans, FRCOG; Dr Mehmet R Gazvani, MRCOG; Dr Rhona G Hughes, FRCOG; Mr Anthony J Kelly MRCOG; Dr Gwyneth Lewis, FRCOG, Department of Health; Dr Mary A C Macintosh, MRCOG, CEMACH; Dr Tahir A Mahmood, FRCOG; Mrs Caroline E Overton, MRCOG, Reproductive medicine; Dr David Parkin, FRCOG; Oncology; Ms Wendy Riches, NICE; Mr Mark C Slack, MRCOG, Urogynaecology; Mr Stephen A Walkinshaw, FRCOG, Maternal and Fetal Medicine; Dr Eleni Mavrides, Trainees Representative

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Guideline authors are required to complete a "declaration of interests" form.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) Web site.

Print copies: Available from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) Bookshop, 27 Sussex Place, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RG; Telephone: +44 020 7772 6276; Fax, +44 020 7772 5991; e-mail: bookshop@rcog.org.uk. A listing and order form are available from the RCOG Web site.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on October 14, 2005.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo