Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Human papillomavirus.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Human papillomavirus. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG); 2005 Apr. 13 p. (ACOG practice bulletin; no. 61). [112 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The grades of evidence (I-III) and levels of recommendation (A-C) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

The following recommendations are based on good and consistent scientific evidence (Level A):

  • Because human papillomavirus (HPV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing is more sensitive than cervical cytology in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and CIN 3, women with negative concurrent test results can be reassured that their risk of unidentified CIN 2 and CIN 3 or cervical cancer is approximately 1 in 1,000.
  • Studies using combined HPV testing with cervical cytology have reported a negative predictive value for CIN 2 and CIN 3 of 99 to 100%.
  • HPV DNA testing is not recommended in women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), atypical squamous cells (ASC) that cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, or atypical glandular cell cytology.
  • The triage of women with ASC of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology using reflex HPV DNA testing for high-risk types when liquid-based cytology was used at the time of the initial visit eliminates the need for a repeat office visit and is a more sensitive triage tool than repeat cytology while referring fewer women to colposcopy.
  • Women with high-risk HPV who have ASC-US or LSIL cytology but are not found to have CIN 2 or CIN 3 at their initial colposcopy have approximately a 10% risk of having CIN 2 or CIN 3 within 2 years.

The following recommendations are based on limited or inconsistent scientific evidence (Level B):

  • Although evidence is lacking that condoms offer complete protection from HPV infection, condom use may reduce the risk of HPV-related disease, such as genital warts and cervical neoplasia.
  • Studies show that condoms may be effective in the clearance of HPV or HPV-associated lesions.
  • Use of a combination of cervical cytology and HPV DNA screening is appropriate for women aged 30 years and older. If this combination is used, women who receive negative results on both tests should be rescreened no more frequently than every 3 years.
  • Because of a similar risk of recurrence, no single treatment for external genital warts can be recommended over another.

The following recommendations are based primarily on consensus and expert opinion (Level C):

  • Women older than 30 years with a negative cytology result who have high-risk HPV DNA positive test results should have both tests repeated in 6 to 12 months. Those with persistent high-risk HPV (on repeat testing) should undergo colposcopy regardless of the cytology result.
  • Human papillomavirus DNA testing could be used as a test of cure for women with CIN 2 or CIN 3 at 6–12 months following excision or ablation of the transformation zone. Those with high-risk HPV should be referred for colposcopy.
  • Treatment for genital warts should be guided by the preference of the patient and the experience of the heath care provider.

Definitions:

Grades of Evidence

I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomized controlled trial.

II-1: Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization.

II-2: Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case–control analytic studies, preferably from more than one center or research group.

II-3: Evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without the intervention. Dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments also could be regarded as this type of evidence.

III: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees.

Levels of Recommendations

Level A — Recommendations are based on good and consistent scientific evidence.

Level B — Recommendations are based on limited or inconsistent scientific evidence.

Level C — Recommendations are based primarily on consensus and expert opinion.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Human papillomavirus. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG); 2005 Apr. 13 p. (ACOG practice bulletin; no. 61). [112 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2005 Apr

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Not stated

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

The following is available:

  • Human papillomavirus infection. Atlanta (GA): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG); 2006.

Electronic copies: Available from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Web site. Copies are also available in Spanish.

Print copies: Available for purchase from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Distribution Center, PO Box 4500, Kearneysville, WV 25430-4500; telephone, 800-762-2264, ext. 192; e-mail: sales@acog.org. The ACOG Bookstore is available online at the ACOG Web site.

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on October 9, 2007. The information was verified by the guideline developer on December 3, 2007.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo