In this chapter we discuss the shifts in the proportions of different
immigration categories over the years of the study.
- The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) legalized a very large
group of farm workers. The vast majority of these workers became Legal
Permanent Residents. Many of these newly legalized workers stayed in
U.S. agriculture and many left.
- The proportion of unauthorized workers rose considerably over the
course of the survey; over one-third (37%) of all farm workers sampled
during the last data collection cycle had no work authorization.
- The proportion of newcomers entering agriculture has been very high
in recent years. In 1994-1995, 18 percent of all farm workers were
working in U.S. agriculture for the first time. Of these first year farm
workers, 70 percent were unauthorized foreigners.
We pointed out in Chapter 1 that there has been a steep increase in the
relative size of the foreign-born population while the U.S. born
population declined during the study period. Since 1989, the proportion of
U.S. born workers has dropped by 10 percent. The long-term trend toward a
higher proportion of foreign-born workers on a national basis is well
documented not only in this paper, but also in the report of the
Commission on Agricultural Workers.1
There has been another important trend within the growing foreign born
population. Since 1989, the number of newly legalized IRCA applicants and
other work-authorized foreigners has been declining as a proportion of the
population, while the proportion of unauthorized workers have increased.
The shifting legal categories of immigrants since the passage of IRCA may
be simply a nominal change which reflects an ongoing, long-term
replacement/displacement of legal, veteran foreign workers by younger
newcomer immigrants.
In 1987 and 1988, more than one million foreigners who listed their
occupation as farm worker applied for legalization under the Special
Agricultural Workers and the General Amnesty program .2
Most of these individuals spent two to four years as Temporary Residents,
and then the vast majority of them obtained Legal Permanent Resident (LPR)
status, mostly in the 1990 to 1992 period. We call these the
IRCA-applicant group. This group of more than a million workers had an
important impact on a labor market estimated at 2.5 million workers.3
Because of the once-only legal categories introduced by IRCA and the
transformation of the legal of a large group of workers in very few years,
presenting the data in two different ways is necessary. First, we divide
the workers by their status at the time of the interview, and then we
describe them by the manner in which they became legalized.
The first categorization highlights the growth of the Legal Permanent
Resident group (those who hold "green cards"), as the IRCA
applicants and their relatives converted to Legal Permanent Resident
status. It also shows the complementary fall off, of workers with
Temporary Resident (IRCA applicants) or Pending (asylee and refugee
applicants) statuses who had work authorization. The Temporary and Pending
status workers fell from 35 percent to 4 percent, while the Legal
Permanent Residents grew steadily from 13 percent in 1989 to 25 percent
during the most recent period (see Table 4.1). These numbers reflect in
part the movement of the IRCA applicants from temporary residents to
permanent residents. Notice, however that the decline in the
Temporary-Pending group is greater than the increase in the Legal
Permanent group. The first declined by 31 percent while the latter grew by
just 12 percent .4
Table 4.1 Percent Distribution of Farm workers by Legal Status at the
time of Interview
Current Legal
Status |
FY 1989 |
FY 1990-91 |
FY 1992-93 |
FY 1994-95 |
Citizen |
42% |
42% |
35% |
32% |
Legal Permanent Resident |
13% |
13% |
20% |
25% |
Temporary, Pending Status |
35% |
26% |
14% |
4% |
Unauthorized |
7% |
16% |
28% |
37% |
Unknown |
3% |
3% |
2% |
2% |
There is a clear explanation of why the LPR proportion did not grow as
much as the proportion of the Temporary and Pending status workers fell.
Many Special Agricultural Workers (SAWs) and the General Amnesty Workers
legalized by IRCA left agriculture. The increase in LPRs represented only
those IRCA-legalized individuals who remained in agriculture. Although
many IRCA-legalized workers stayed in agriculture, large numbers left. In
1989, one-third of all farm workers were IRCA-legalized, while in
1994-1995 that proportion had declined to 19 percent. A small group of
other legal categories like asylum and refugee claimants (Other Work
Authorized) also dropped from 7 to 3 percent (see Table 4.2). As these
workers departed agriculture, a very large group of unauthorized workers
entered--from only 7 percent in 1989, the proportion grew steadily to 37
percent in the 1994-1995 period. 5
Table 4.2 Percent Distribution of Farm workers by Method of Legalization
Method of
Obtaining Legal
Status |
FY 1989 |
FY 1990-91 |
FY 1992-93 |
FY 1994-95 |
Citizen |
42% |
42% |
34% |
30% |
IRCA Applicant |
33% |
29% |
25% |
19% |
Family Program |
1% |
3% |
6% |
7% |
Other Work Authorized |
7% |
7% |
4% |
3% |
Unauthorized |
7% |
16% |
28% |
37% |
Unknown |
11% |
3% |
2% |
2% |
The survey also shows evidence of a rapid influx of newcomer farm
workers from abroad during the period of the study, and most of these
first time U.S. farm workers were unauthorized. In 1994-95, 18 percent of
all farm workers were in their first year in U.S. farm work. Of these
newcomers, 70 percent were unauthorized foreigners.6
It cannot be shown directly from the survey data why so many of the
newly legalized and other work authorized groups left agriculture during
this period. It may be that opportunities for non farm work "pulled"
them out of agriculture. However, the survey does demonstrate clearly that
an extreme surplus of workers has existed throughout the study period and
continues today. In fact, even during the peak month of July, less than
three-fifths of farm workers are employed at farm work (see Table 4.3).
During the period of the study, real farm worker wages 7
and earnings (see Chapter III above) declined. Therefore, it is equally as
likely that the continuing farm labor surplus and the worsening economic
conditions for farm workers may have "pushed" the veteran
workers out of agriculture.8
By legalizing a large part of the agricultural labor force, IRCA
temporarily reduced the level of unauthorized farm workers. In 1989, only
7 percent of farm workers were unauthorized. However, the tendency for new
entrants to enter agriculture every year from abroad showed absolutely no
sign of slowing despite the large legalization program.
Table 4.3 Percent of Farm Workers in Different Activities
NATIONAL
FIGURES BY MONTH |
|
U.S. FARM
WORK |
U.S. NON-FARM
WORK |
NOT WORKING
WHILE IN U.S. |
ABROAD |
TOTAL |
JAN |
28% |
14% |
28% |
30% |
100% |
FEB |
31% |
14% |
28% |
27% |
100% |
MAR |
37% |
12% |
26% |
25% |
100% |
APR |
46% |
11% |
22% |
21% |
100% |
MAY |
51% |
13% |
19% |
17% |
100% |
JUN |
56% |
12% |
13% |
19% |
100% |
JUL |
56% |
12% |
13% |
19% |
100% |
AUG |
53% |
12% |
14% |
21% |
100% |
SEP |
47% |
12% |
19% |
22% |
100% |
OCT |
43% |
13% |
21% |
23% |
100% |
NOV |
38% |
13% |
23% |
26% |
100% |
DEC |
32% |
13% |
25% |
30% |
100% |
Data collected from October 1994 to September 1995. Sampling of activity
performed in the month done on the week containing the 15th of the month.
1 Report of the Commission on Agricultural
Workers, November, 1992, Washington, D.C.
2 The Special Agricultural Workers had to
demonstrate that they had worked in U.S. fruit, vegetable and
horticultural agriculture for 90 days during the 1985-1986 season. The
General Amnesty workers had to show they had lived continuously in the
United States since January, 1982. The IRCA-applicant farm workers were
overwhelmingly SAWs.
3 See Report of the Commission on
Agricultural Workers.
4 There was another category of method of
adjustment which was also expanding among farmworkers during the years of
the study. Workers who had applied to adjust their immigration status
through family unification programs grew from 1 percent to 8 percent of
all farmworkers (see Table 4. 2).
5 There has been a small increase in the
H2-A agricultural nonimmigrant worker program. In 1996, the number
increased to about 17,000 workers.
6 Most of the rest were young citizen
workers 22 years of age. Sixty percent of the citizen newcomers were less
than 22 years of age.
7 See data from the Quarterly Agricultural
Workers Survey of the USDA.
8 One unanswered question is whether this
displacement of unauthorized workers by unauthorized workers would have
occurred had real farmworker wages and earnings not declined or if other
adjustments in the labor market, such as employer provided housing, health
insurance, vacations, and the like, had occurred during the post- IRCA
period.