Home | Text Only | Feedback | Accessibility |


banner
Search

pixel of space
Bullet PMB Home
pixel of space
Bullet DAS-PAHR Home
pixel of space
Bullet DCHCO Home
pixel of space
Bullet About Sharon D. Eller
pixel of space

EEO AREAS
pixel of space
Bullet Civil Rights
pixel of space
Bullet Complaints Processing
pixel of space
Bullet Workforce Diversity
pixel of space

EEO INFORMATION
pixel of space
Bullet Best Practices - New!
pixel of space
Bullet Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
pixel of space
Bullet Complaints Procedures
pixel of space
Bullet Complaints Timeline
pixel of space
Bullet DI-1935 Applicant Background Survey
pixel of space
Bullet Diversity Training Requirement
pixel of space
Bullet EEO Counselors Phone Directory
pixel of space
Bullet
pixel of space
Bullet Contact EEO Headquarters
pixel of space
Bullet EEO Plus
pixel of space

EEO TOOLS
pixel of space
Bullet Policy
pixel of space
Bullet Equal Opportunity Directives
pixel of space

Resources - Protected Group
pixel of space
Bullet Significant Cases
pixel of space

OTHER LINKS

pixel of space
Bullet

Hurricane Katrina Resources

for Individuals with Disabilities

pixel of space
Bullet OPM Website
pixel of space
Bullet ExcelGov Website
pixel of space
pixel of space
pixel of space
Banner

 

Age Cases

 

The following are some of the significant cases in this area. They are offered as a start to understanding the issues, and are not intended as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from DOI's Solicitor's Office or private counsel. These summaries are intended neither as a legal analysis regarding specific matters, nor as a complete review of the topic.


  1. Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criswell, 472 U.S. 400, 113 S.Ct. 2743 (1985). The Court invalidated an airline company's rule requiring flight engineers to retire at the age of sixty because the age discrimination was not reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the airline company's business.
  2. Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins, 507 U.S. 604, 113 S.Ct. 1701 (1993). The court stated that the essence of age discrimination is "for an older employee to be fired because the employer believes that productivity and competence decline with old age." Court held that there is no disparate treatment under the ADEA when the factor motivating the employer is some feature other than the employee's age..
  3. O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp., 517 U.S. 308, 116 S.Ct 1307 (1996). Held that a plaintiff's replacement need not be under 40 years of age in order for the plaintiff to make out a prima facie case of age discrimination under the McDonnell Douglas paradigm.
  4. Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc., 118 S.Ct. 838 (1998). Not necessary to tender back consideration to challenge settlement of age discrimination case if there is a failure to comply with Older Workers Benefit Protection Act.

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     
Privacy Disclaimer | Policies & Procedures | Disability Information | FOIA | FirstGov | DOI Home | PMB Home

U.S. Department of the Interior
Office of Civil Rights
Web Contact: Send e-Mail to Webmaster
Last Updated on 6/29/06