| |
Trends in the Potential for Nutrient Loading
from Confined Livestock Operations
Robert L. Kellogg
and Charles H. Lander, NRCS/USDA
Poster Presentation for "The State of North America's Private Land,"
A Conference Held January 19-21, 1999, Chicago, Illinois
PURPOSE OF STUDY
Lander, Moffitt, and Alt conducted a study published by the National Resources
Conservation Service in 1998 titled "Nutrients Available from Livestock
Manure Relative to Crop Growth Requirements." Using farm-level census
data from the 1992 Agriculture Census, the authors presented county
estimates of pounds of manure nitrogen and phosphorus potentially
generated from confined livestock, and compared these estimates to the
potential for nitrogen and phosphorus uptake/removal by crops and
application on pastureland. The results of the study were widely used by
policy makers in deliberations on the growing animal waste problems
throughout the Nation.
The purpose of the present study is to make similar estimates for
earlier years to show the spatial and temporal trends in the potential
for problems associated with animal waste.
ANALYSIS
Published Agricultural Census data for 1949, 1954, 1959, 1964, 1969,
1974, 1978, 1982, 1987, and 1992 were used to make county estimates of
livestock populations and crop and pastureland acreage. These data were
combined with estimates of recoverable manure (mostly from confinement),
nutrient content of manure, nutrient content of the harvested portion of
crops, and manure application rates on pastureland to calculate the
nutrient availability from manure relative to potential plant uptake
and removal. All calculations were made using county data; thus, each
county was treated as a single large farm. Because of confidentiality
restrictions, data for some counties were not available. The analysis
presented here differs slightly from that reported by Lander, Moffitt,
and Alt, largely because published county data were used rather than
farm-level census data. Results in this paper correspond most closely
to Scenario 3 in Lander, Moffitt, and Alt.
Nutrient Availability from Manure
Sixteen livestock types were derived from the data:
-
Beef animals
-
Young calves up to about 425 pounds.
-
Young heifers and steers from about 425 pounds to 650 pounds.
-
Heifers for herd replacement (650 pounds to full weight)
-
Breeding herd
-
Fattened cattle (650 pounds and up)
-
Dairy animals
-
Young calves up to about 425 pounds.
-
Young heifers and steers from about 425 pounds to 650 pounds.
-
Heifers for herd replacement (650 pounds to full weight)
-
Milk cows
-
Hogs and pigs
-
Hogs for breeding
-
Hogs on feed
-
Poultry
-
Chicken layers
-
Chicken pullets
-
Chicken broilers
-
Turkeys for breeding
-
Turkeys for slaughter
Tons of recoverable manure was calculated for each livestock type by
converting population numbers to standard animal units, multiplying the
animal units by tons of manure produced, and then multiplying by the
recoverable manure percentage, which was derived to reflect confined
populations and included an adjustment for typical nutrient loss that
occurs during storage and handling. Tons of manure nitrogen and manure
phosphorus were calculated by multiplying tons of manure by nutrient
content for each livestock type.
Crop Uptake and Removal
Uptake and removal of nitrogen and phosphorus for 21 crops was
estimated. The total production of each harvested crop was multiplied
by the nitrogen and phosphorus content of the harvested biomass. A
utilization efficiency factor of 70 percent was applied to nitrogen to
account for the consumption of nitrogen during plant growth. The 21 crops
are:
-
corn for grain
-
corn for silage
-
sorghum for grain
-
sorghum for silage
-
winter wheat
-
durum wheat
-
other spring wheat
-
soybeans
-
oats
-
barley
-
cotton
-
tobacco
-
Irish potatoes
-
sweet potatoes
-
rye for grain
-
sugar beets for sugar
-
grass silage
-
alfalfa hay
-
small grain hay
-
sorghum hay
-
other tame hay
Application of Manure on Pastureland
There were two categories of pastureland enumerated in the Agriculture
Census: 1) cropland used for pasture, and 2) pastureland and rangeland.
Data from other sources were used to exclude rangeland acreage. It was
assumed that 100 percent of the cropland used for pasture would be
accessible for application of manure, and 50 percent of the pastureland
would be accessible. In the simulation, nutrients from manure were
applied at a rate considered appropriate for plant growth assuming the
land was being grazed--75 pounds per acre for manure nitrogen and 30
pounds per acre for manure phosphorus.
Manure Nutrient Availability Relative to Crop Uptake/Removal and Pastureland Application
The manure nutrient availability and the plant nutrient uptake and
removal in pounds were aggregated over livestock types and crops by
county, and the ratio of availability to uptake/removal was calculated.
A ratio greater than one suggests that the quantity of nutrients in manure
exceeds the potential for crop uptake and pastureland application in the
county, assuming all the acreage included in the calculation could be used
for disposal. Ratios were converted to percentages, and the following
four categories were used to make the accompanying maps:
-
Less than 25 percent of nutrients taken up and removed by crops (or
applied to pasture) that could be supplied from manure. For
the county as a whole, these quantities of manure nutrients would not be
considered to cause livestock waste problems since the capacity of the
cropland and pastureland in these counties to use nutrients exceeds the
production of manure nutrients by a factor greater than 4.
-
25 to 50 percent of nutrients taken up and removed by crops (or
applied to pasture) that could be supplied from manure. The
capacity of the cropland and pastureland in these counties to use
nutrients exceeds the production of manure nutrients by a factor of 2-4.
This is generally greater than the percentage of cropland reported in
farmer surveys that is used for disposal of animal wastes. For example,
surveys report that in major corn producing states, only 15-20 percent of
corn acreage has manure applied to it; percentages are much lower for
other crops. Some problems related to livestock waste could occur in
these counties.
-
50 to 100 percent of nutrients taken up and removed by crops (or
applied to pasture) that could be supplied from manure. The
capacity of the cropland and pastureland in these counties to use
nutrients exceeds the production of manure nutrients by only a factor of
1-2. Since it is not economical to haul waste long distances, it is
unlikely that all the available capacity can actually be used, and thus
it is likely that these counties have significant animal waste related
problems.
-
100 percent or greater of nutrients taken up and removed by crops
(or applied to pasture) that could be supplied from manure.
In these counties, the capacity of cropland and pastureland to absorb
nutrients without buildup in the soil is exceeded by the quantity of
manure nutrients produced by confined livestock. Significant livestock
waste related problems are expected in these counties unless producers
are treating a substantial portion of the animal manure.
Counties with less than 1000 animal units were excluded from the analysis.
Caveats
-
Not all land that could be used for animal waste disposal was
incorporated in the calculations. A few counties will have additional
acreage of fallow land, idle cropland, minor crops, fruits, nuts, and
vegetables that could be used for animal waste disposal.
-
The analysis assumes that animal waste cannot be transported to
adjacent counties. In some cases, it may be possible to economically
transport some of the waste to counties with higher cropland and pastureland acreage.
-
Application of commercial fertilizers, which is not included in the
analysis, greatly increases the potential for water quality problems
related to nutrients.
-
The simulation cannot be used to conclude that counties with excess
manure production are causing water quality or other problems, only that
the potential exists.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Animal Units
Map 1
shows the spatial distribution
of estimated total animal units from which manure is recoverable
(predominately confined livestock) for 1992. The spatial distribution of
animal units for each of four livestock types comprising the total (beef,
dairy, swine, and poultry) are shown in maps
2,
3,
4,
and 5.
Beef animal units were the highest, followed by
dairy, swine, and poultry. Changes in animal units over time are shown in
figure 1.
(Note on the map legends: In the process of converting maps
to the World Wide Web the legends on certain maps became unreadable due to
their small size. As a temporary solution the legends are presented in a
separate file until we
can update the maps. Simply look up the map number to find the
appropriate legend.)
Manure Nutrient Production
Estimated manure phosphorus and nitrogen production for 1992 are shown
in maps 6 and
7,
respectively. Changes in manure phosphorus and nitrogen
production are shown in figures
2 and
3.
In the earlier years, dairy was
the predominant source of manure nutrients from confined livestock. In
recent years, however, poultry was the predominant source.
Potential for Manure Nutrients to Exceed Plant Uptake and Removal
Maps showing the four categories of the ratios of manure nutrient
availability to plant uptake and removal, including pastureland
application, are presented for each of the 10 years. Phosphorus maps for
1949 through 1992 are shown in
maps 8-17, and
nitrogen maps are shown in
maps 18-27.
Heaviest concentrations of counties with a potential for livestock waste
related problems were in the northern part of the midwest, along the coast
in the northwest, counties in the southwest, and most counties in the
northeast in the earlier years. In the later years, concentrations moved
into the southern states and the potential decreased in the northern
midwest and the northeast and intensified in the northwest and the
southwest. The midwest, where a large amount of manure nutrients is
produced, was largely devoid of potential problem counties because of the
abundance of cropland available for disposal.
There were more counties with potential phosphorus excess than
potential nitrogen excess in all years (figures
4
and 5).
The total number of counties where
manure phosphorus production was high relative to plant uptake and removal
decreased from 1949 to 1992, but the number of counties where manure
phosphorus exceeded the capacity of the crops and pastureland to
assimilate the phosphorus increased, and became more concentrated in the
southern states. A similar trend occurred for nitrogen, but not as
pronounced.
The number of counties where manure nutrients exceed potential plant
uptake and removal is a useful indicator of trends in the potential for
livestock waste related problems. This indicator is shown in
6figure 6.
To reverse these trends, livestock production would need to move back to
areas of the country that have sufficient cropland available for
application at rates that will not result in excessive build-up of
nutrients in the soil.
Watersheds with High Potential for Soil and Water Degradation
County data for 1992 were converted to a watershed basis to identify
watersheds that are most at risk from manure nitrogen or phosphorus
leaching and runoff. Conversion weights derived from the Natural
Resources Inventory for 1992 were used to obtain a weighted total of the
ratio of manure nutrient availability to nutrient uptake and removal for
8-digit hydrologic units (cataloging units). Watersheds with a weighted
total ratio greater than 0.5, which are the watersheds most likely to
have animal waste related problems, are shown in
map 28 for manure phosphorus and
map 29 for manure nitrogen.
NEXT STEPS
-
The time series will be extended to 1997 when the 1997 Agriculture Census is released later this year.
-
Crop production statistics incorporate yield variability that is due to weather. Rather than base the calculation on reported production, the calculation will be based on average yields to provide more consistent estimates over time and space of the potential capacity within a county to assimilate livestock wastes.
-
Data for some crops and livestock types were not available for all years of the Agriculture Census. For the present study, data gaps were filled using interpolations or data from other years. Future work will incorporate data from a variety of other sources, including NASS county and state data on livestock inventories, crop acreage, and crop yields.
-
Using other data sources in addition to the Agriculture Census, an attempt will be made to construct an annual series.
APPENDIX: List of Figures and Maps
| | |