U. S. Food and Drug Administration
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
March 1999


Economic Characterization of the
Dietary Supplement Industry
Final Report

Table of Contents


Section 3
Facilities and Firms

Currently available estimates of the number of facilities and firms that supply raw materials and manufacture DS products cover a broad range. The Nutrition Business Journal estimates that in 1997, 150 raw material manufacturers and over 1,000 growers and harvesters supplied raw materials to the industry and 1,050 manufacturers produced finished DS products (see Figure 1-1). The Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN) estimates that between 800 and 1,400 raw material suppliers and manufacturers serve the market. These estimates are similar to the estimate of over 1,100 DS raw material and manufacturing firms that are members of the five major DS trade organizations. This may be an overstatement to the extent that some firms belong to multiple organizations but an understatement to the extent that some firms belong to none of the organizations.

RTI compiled information on plants and firms in the DS industry in the Dietary Supplement Enhanced Establishment Database (DS-EED). To the extent that data are available, the records contain information such as name and location of facilities, DS product type, facility type (manufacturer, ingredient supplier, repackager/relabeler/encapsulator, importer, exporter), other product types manufactured, sales, employment, SIC codes, NAICS and international codes. The sources of this information include the following:

After deleting duplicate records from these sources, 2,026 facilities remained in the DS-EED. Of these 2,026 facilities, 1,978 are located in the United States, 42 are located in Canada, and 6 are located in Puerto Rico.

In Section 3.1, we describe the characteristics of the facilities in the DS-EED. In Section 3.2, we describe financial data for the DS industry.

3.1 Facility Characteristics

The facilities in the DS-EED are characterized by facility type, product type, and other products produced. Each of these characteristics is described below.

The facility type indicates whether a facility manufactures, distributes, imports, exports, repackages, relabels, or encapsulates DS products or whether a facility provides raw ingredients to the industry. Table 3-1 provides frequencies for each facility type. Because a facility may be involved in more than one activity, the frequencies add up to greater than the total number of facilities in the database.

Table 3-1. DS Facility Type Frequencies
Facility Type Number of Facilities Percentage of Facilities

Manufacturer

1,555

78.6%

Input supplier

316

16.0%

Repackager, relabeler, or encapsulator

347

17.5%

Distributor

268

13.5%

Importer

209

10.6%

Exporter

340

17.2%

Source: Dietary Supplement Enhanced Establishment Database (DS-EED), as obtained March 24, 1999.

More than 78 percent of the facilities in the DS-EED are manufacturers of DS products. Sixteen percent of the facilities provide raw ingredients; 17 percent repack, relabel, or encapsulate products; and 13 percent distribute products. More plants export products (17 percent) versus import products (11 percent).

The product type indicates the type of DS produced or handled by each facility. Table 3-2 provides frequencies for each facility type. Vitamins and minerals, which are grouped together because facilities nearly always produce both in combination, are produced or handled by more than half (54 percent) of the facilities. Facilities that produce or handle herbals and botanicals follow at 43 percent. Herbal and botanical extracts, which are a subset of herbals and botanicals, are produced or handled by 14 percent of facilities. Teas follow at 10 percent, amino acids at 9 percent, proteins at 4 percent, and animal extracts at 2 percent. Concentrates, metabolites, and constituents are produced or handled at 4 percent of plants, but this figure may not represent the true total because the industry directories used to compile the DS-EED did not provide sufficient

Table 3-2. DS Product Type Frequencies
Product Type Number of Facilitiesa Percentage of Facilities

Vitamins and Minerals

1,066

53.9%

Herbals and Botanicals

850

43.0%

Herbal and Botanical Extracts

273

13.8%

Animal Extracts

34

1.7%

Amino Acids

186

9.4%

Proteins

87

4.4%

Tea

200

10.1%

Concentrates, Metabolites, and Constituents

80

4.0%

Other Supplements

602

30.4%

a The record source for 372 facilities did not indicate any product types.

Source: Dietary Supplement Enhanced Establishment Database (DS-EED), as obtained March 24, 1999.

detail to identify these products. Similarly, nearly 19 percent of facility records indicate no product types, which is also due to insufficient detail in the industry directories. Table 3-3 further breaks out product type by facility type for comparison across facility types.

Other products produced indicates whether a facility produces foods and/or drugs in addition to dietary supplements. Table 3-4 provides frequencies of facilities producing each of these other product types. Approximately 21 percent of facilities also produce foods and 17 percent also produce drugs.

3.2 DS Financial Data

Future versions of the DS-EED will likely contain more information on sales and employment at individual facilities than is available from industry directories. Once this information becomes available, it will be possible to characterize DS facilities based on sales volumes and employment. In addition, parent company information can be used to categorize DS companies as small or large.

The U.S. Small Business Administration (1997) size definitions for the most relevant SIC codes are the following:

Table 3-3. Frequencies of DS Product Types Produced at Each Facility Typea
  Manu-facturer Input Supplier Repackager/
Relabeler/
Encapsulator
Distributor Importer Exporter Number of Facilities
Vitamins and Minerals 857 147 198 171 98 197 1,066
Herbals & Botanicals 647 184 237 186 140 198 850
Herbal and Botanical Extracts 209 115 85 53 59 71 273
Animal Extracts 28 3 5 6 5 8 34
Amino Acids 153 32 39 28 23 49 186
Teas 156 46 53 43 41 43 200
Proteins 80 14 16 12 10 19 87
Concentrates, Metabolites, and Constituents 67 17 26 11 8 17 80
Other Supplements 528 88 106 53 61 108 602
Number of Facilities 1,555 316 347 268 209 340  
a Facilities may be of multiple types and may produce multiple products.

Source: Dietary Supplement Enhanced Establishment Database (DS-EED), as obtained March 24, 1999.

Table 3-4. Frequencies of Other Products Produced at DS Facilities
Other Products Number of Facilities Percentage of Facilities

Foods

414

20.9%

Drugs

339

17.1%

Source: Dietary Supplement Enhanced Establishment Database (DS-EED), as obtained March 24, 1999.

Based on these definitions, it is likely that the majority of firms in the DS industry will be considered small.

The Nutrition Business Journal provides sales information for the largest DS manufacturers. These sales data include only supplements rather than sales of all products produced by each company. Table 3-5 lists supplement sales for the top 15 manufacturers. Additional information on the facilities owned by these companies is available in the DS-EED.

Table 3-5. Top 15 Dietary Supplement Manufacturers, 1997
Manufacturer

Location

Supplement Sales ($ million)
Leiner Health Products Carson, CA 425
Pharmavite San Fernando, CA 340
American Home Products

Madison, NJ

325
Rexall Sundown Boca Raton, FL 291
NBTY Bohemia, NY 281
General Nutrition Companies Pittsburgh, PA 260
Weider Nutrition Group Salt Lake City, UT 219
Twin Laboratories Hauppauge, NY 213
Abbott Labs Columbus, OH 170
Perrigo Allegan, MI 152
Solgar Vitamin & Herb Company Hackensack, NJ 120
Bayer Corporation Pittsburgh, PA 110
IVC Industries Freehold, NJ 109
Experimental & Applied Sciences Golden, CO 108
Nature's Way Products Springville, UT 100
Source: Nutrition Business International. September 1998. "$23 Billion and Counting: Nutrition Industry Braces for a Competitive Future." 3(9):1-5, 13, 18.


Table of Contents


Home    |    Dietary Supplements
Hypertext updated by ces/dms 1999-OCT-06