Skip common site navigation and headers
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Ground Water & Drinking Water
Begin Hierarchical Links EPA Home > Water > Ground Water & Drinking Water > National Drinking Water Advisory Council > Minutes Of Meeting Held July 21, 1997 End Hierarchical Links

 

Minutes Of Meeting Held July 21, 1997

Executive Summary

BY CONFERENCE CALL IN WASHINGTON, D.C.

Background

A meeting of the National Drinking Water Advisory Council (NDWAC) was held at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Headquarters in Room 1209 of the East Tower. The meeting began at approximately 2:05p.m. without a Court Stenographer present to take verbatim transcription. Therefore, the following information is a result of the notes taken by the Designated Federal Officer and EPA staff present in the room. The Conference Call was held to receive recommendations from the Council's Occurrence and Contaminant Selection Working Group (Attachment 2).

Council Members Present on Call

L.D. McMullen, Chair
Maurice Arel
Walter Bishop
Diane Kiesling
Nina McClelland
Paul Nannis (Participating, but not voting)
Diana Neidle
John Scheltens
James Tripp
William VanDeValk
Thomas Yohe

NDWAC Members not Participating

Patrick Banegas
James Cleland
Susan Seacrest

EPA Staff Present

Charlene Shaw, Designated Federal Officer (DFO), NDWAC
Cynthia Dougherty, Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water (OGWDW)
Evelyn Washington, DFO, Occurrence and Contaminant Selection Working Group
Bill Diamond, Director, Standards and Risk Management Division, OGWDW
Jim Taft, Chief, Targeting & Analysis Branch, OGWDW
Dave Huber, OGWDW

Others Present

Pat Ware, BNA (in Room)
Diane VanDeHei, Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (on Phone)
Tom Schaeffer, Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (on Phone)

The Council was sent several documents (attached to July 18 meeting notes) to review prior to the meeting. The purpose of the meeting was to review the Working Group's papers and pass on to the EPA those items that were agreed to as formal recommendations of the Council. There was some discussion by the Council on the process used by the Working Group to select the contaminants on the list. Wally Bishop lead the discussion of these issues:

A.
The Working Group felt they were not prepared to begin tiering or dividing the list of contaminants into those with sufficient vs those with insufficient information for regulatory determination, but expect input by February to ultimately separate the contaminants into these two "categories."
B.
An expert panel of microbiologists provided input on microorganisms via the EPA Microbiology and Public Health Workshop held May 20-12, 1997. The input has been reviewed and accepted.
C.
Contaminants that were called into the Safe Drinking Water Hotline were only considered if they showed up on the other databases being considered by the Working Group.
D.
Contaminants identified as endocrine disruptors deferred for future consideration pending ongoing efforts by the National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, and EPA's Office of Research and Development.
E.
A question posed by John Scheltens was asked under Occurrence (B.1.c). As stated, the use of small systems in the criteria for inclusion may bring about a false positive and therefore the process should be looked at prior to adoption as part of the any permanent criteria.
F.
Did the reference to endocrine disruptors relate to a survey that was being done, hence a database of sorts? It was stated by EPA that there was no survey, but the health effects of endocrine disruptors was being considered. Once again it was reiterated, that contaminants were not being eliminated, but deferred.
G.
The question was asked, "Do we feel that in following this selection process, did we let something slip?" EPA responded that when the Federal Register notice is published, we will request comment on "is this the right set? Is there something we missed that should be included? Is there something we included that should not have been?

Following the discussion of process, the Chair entertained questions on the list itself.

A.
The question was posed by Nina McClelland on inclusion of Organo Tins (Tributyl tin),

"Why was this included on the list?" EPA responded it was due to the concern on PVC Pipes used to deliver potable water. Nina was concerned that EPA was limited their consideration to tributyl tin in parentheses on the list and felt it should be removed and remain solely as organo tin. EPA agreed to show only Organo Tins as the contaminant.

B.
In considering a statement for sensitive subpopulations and sodium, it was suggested that we include the water softening industry as a stakeholder in any discussions.
C.
As opposed to considering cyanazine and other triazine pesticide as individual compounds, address them by addressing the group of triazine pesticides using a total triazine standard.
D.
Defer 31 pesticides identified based solely on a calculated Risk value of 2.0 or greater developed by the EPA Office of Pesticides Programs. The risk value does not include a component which relates to concentrations of concern to human health. A more comprehensive body of work is underway and will provide a risk calculation which includes physical-chemical properties, pesticide use as well as a human health related component. This body of work will be available for future use.

Following the above discussion, the Council considered and passed unanimously the following three recommendations:

RECOMMENDATION 1

The Council recommends that the List be the draft Contaminant Candidate List, noting that any contaminants not included but reviewed have been deferred pending further review and information, not eliminated from future consideration.

RECOMMENDATION 2

The Council recommends that the List be published as draft in the Federal Register to seek public comment.

RECOMMENDATION 3

The Council recommends that in the Federal Register notice the information needs be specially stated, and comment sought for subsequent division of contaminants into "categories" dividing contaminants based on whether there is sufficient or insufficient information for regulatory determination. It is recommended that additional information and comment be sought on the inclusion of perchlorate on the final Candidate List.

The Council meeting was adjourned by its Chair, L.D. McMullen.

Attachments:

1. Executive Summary, NDWAC Working Group on Occurrence & Contaminant Selection, Conference Call of July 17, 1997, dated July 18, 1997

2. Proposed Recommendations, NDWAC Working Group on Occurrence & Contaminant Selection, DRAFT, dated July 18, 1997



I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the foregoing minutes of complete and accurate.

____________________________________
L.D. McMullen, Chair, National Drinking
Water Advisory Council

____________________________________
Date

____________________________________
Charlene E. Shaw, Designated Federal Officer
National Drinking Water Advisory Council

____________________________________
Date


Safewater Home | About Our Office | Publications | Links | Office of Water | En Español | Questions and Answers

 
Begin Site Footer

EPA Home | Privacy and Security Notice | Contact Us