[Deschler's Precedents] [From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access] [DOCID:52093c13_txt-14] [Page 1841-1843] CHAPTER 13 Powers and Prerogatives of the House C. HOUSE PREROGATIVE TO ORIGINATE REVENUE BILLS Sec. 13. In General The precedents in sections 15-18, infra, relate to the constitutional prerogative of the House to originate bills to raise revenue.(4) Article I, section 7, clause 1, provides that, ``All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.'' (5) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. See 2 Hinds' Precedents Sec. Sec. 1480-1501; 6 Cannon's Precedents Sec. Sec. 314-322; and 8 Cannon's Precedents Sec. 2278, for earlier precedents. 5. See House Rules and Manual Sec. 99 (1973). See also Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation, S. Doc. No. 92-82, 92d Cong. 2d Sess. 125, 126 (1973), for discussion of this provision. And see Sec. Sec. 19, 20, infra, for a discussion of Senate authority to amend revenue bills and make appropriations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Because questions relating to the prerogative of the House to originate revenue legislation (6) involve interpretation of the Constitution (7) rather than House [[Page 1842]] rules, they are decided by the House rather than the Chair.(~8~) A question alleging that the Senate has invaded this prerogative is privileged (9) under Rule IX,(10) and may be raised at any time when the House is in possession of the bill and related papers in question.(11) The question may be raised pending the motion to call up a conference report on a bill (12) and may be committed to conference if raised prior to conference.(13) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. For one view on what is comprehended by the phrase ``bills for raising revenue,'' see J. Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States Sec. 880, vol. 1, Boston (1833). 7. See, for example, the discussion and cases cited in Sec. 19.2, infra. 8. 2 Hinds' Precedents Sec. 1490. See also Sec. 19.1, infra, for an analogous Senate precedent. 9. Sec. 14.1, infra. 10. House Rules and Manual Sec. Sec. 661, 662 (1973). 11. Sec. 14.2, infra. 12. Id. 13. 2 Hinds' Precedents Sec. 1487. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A Senate bill or joint resolution (14) which the House determines infringes upon its prerogatives may be returned to the Senate. When such a measure is received by, or is in possession of the House, a Member may rise to a question of privilege and introduce a resolution. Such resolution normally declares that in the opinion of the House the Senate measure contravenes or infringes upon the House prerogative and directs that the measure be returned to the Senate with a message communicating the resolution. After debate the resolution may be approved,(15) tabled, (16) or referred to committee.(17) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14. There is precedent for the proposition that a Senate concurrent resolution may also be held to infringe upon the prerogative of the House, notwithstanding the fact that such a resolution does not have the force of law. 6 Cannon's Precedents Sec. 319. 15. See Sec. 15, infra, for illustrations of approval. 16. See Sec. 16.1, infra, for a discussion of tabling such a resolution. 17. See Sec. 17.1, infra, for an illustration of referral to committee. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On several occasions, the House has chosen to pass a House bill instead of a pending Senate measure where the attention of the House was called to the impropriety of a revenue measure being included in a Senate bill.(18) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18. See Sec. Sec. 18.1-18.3, infra which illustrate this procedure. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- When a Senate bill or joint resolution which arguably infringes upon the House prerogative has been referred to committee, the committee may refuse to act on it and may report out its own bill in lieu of the Senate measure.(l9) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19. See Sec. Sec. 18.4, 18.5, infra, which illustrate this procedure. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The latter two procedures, vacating proceedings whereby the Senate measure had passed the House and massaging a similar House bill to the Senate, and reporting a House bill out of com [[Page 1843]] mittee, effectively resolve issues relating to the prerogative of the House, because courts do not look behind the bill number. Notwithstanding the fact that a House revenue measure may have been substantially changed by Senate amendments, a bill with a House number will not be challenged in court or on the House floor on the ground that it infringes upon the prerogative of the House to originate bills for raising revenue.(20) But the House will assert its prerogative and return a House bill (not raising revenue) with a Senate revenue amendment to the Senate.~(2~1) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20. See Hubbard v Lowe, 226 F 135 (S.D.N.Y. 1915) which is discussed at Sec. Sec. 19.2, 20.4, infra. 21. See Sec. 15.8, infra. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------