Table 1-6: Kentucky Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000 Interstate (total reported),226,226,228,226,226,229 Very good ,4,36,60,44,61,67 Good,52,74,83,91,85,90 Fair,51,45,38,29,23,28 Mediocre ,81,63,41,53,42,32 Poor,38,8,6,9,15,12 Not reported,0,0,0,0,0,1 ,,,,,, Other freeways and expressways (total reported),93,93,90,92,93,90 Very good ,3,26,14,6,20,0 Good,21,23,33,38,30,43 Fair,15,5,18,19,22,30 Mediocre ,40,36,17,17,20,15 Poor,14,3,8,12,1,2 Not reported,0,0,0,0,0,0 ,,,,,, Other principal arterial (total reported),632,634,638,652,650,658 Very good ,7,38,27,20,37,26 Good,144,245,293,269,246,224 Fair,150,164,167,205,245,179 Mediocre ,212,131,108,117,93,167 Poor,119,56,43,41,29,62 Not reported,0,0,0,0,0,0 ,,,,,, Urban minor arterial (total reported),N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,"1,182" Very good ,N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,8 Good,N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,190 Fair,N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,828 Mediocre ,N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,109 Poor,N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,47 Not reported,N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,0 ,,,,,, Urban collector (total reported),N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,"1,145" Very good ,N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,0 Good,N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,52 Fair,N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,133 Mediocre ,N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,525 Poor,N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,435 Not reported,N ,N ,N ,N ,N ,0 ,,,,,, KEY: N = data do not exist.,,,,,, ,,,,,, "NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceabili",,,,,, NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement di,,,,,, ,,,,,, "SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.",,,,,,