![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081018110705im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081018110705im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081018110705im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081018110705im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
Table 3-10: Foreign and Domestic Waterborne Shipments to Michigan by Origin: 2000
Excel | CSV
Total shipped to Michigan |
45,765,656 |
100.0 |
Michigan (intrastate) |
15,455,815 |
33.8 |
Wisconsin |
14,121,666 |
30.9 |
Canada |
7,129,454 |
15.6 |
Ohio |
4,877,322 |
10.7 |
Foreign (excluding Canada) |
1,383,489 |
3.0 |
Illinois |
1,284,477 |
2.8 |
Indiana |
1,180,854 |
2.6 |
Minnesota |
332,396 |
0.7 |
Pennsylvania |
183 |
<0.1 |
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center, Origin and Destination of Waterborne Commerce of the United States, 2000, available at http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil as of Feb. 12, 2002.
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081018110705im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081018110705im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081018110705im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081018110705im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |