Data for Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Tennessee: 2000,,,,
,,,,
(Miles),,,,
,Interstate ,Other principal arterial ,Minor arterial,Major collector
Total,735,"1,683","3,342",N
   Very good ,536,655,46,N
   Good,190,861,"1,747",N
   Fair,7,163,"1,369",N
   Mediocre ,2,3,180,N
   Poor,0,1,0,N
,,,,

(Percent),,,,
,Interstate ,Other principal arterial ,Minor arterial,Major collector
Total,100,100,100,N
Very good ,73,39,1,N
Good,26,51,52,N,,
Fair,1,10,41,N,,
Mediocre ,0,0,5,N,,
Poor,0,0,0,N,,
,,,,,,
NOTE:  Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.,,,,,,
,,,,,,
KEY FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: N = data do not exist.,,,,,,
,,,,,,
"NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE:  Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition.  A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.  ",,,,,,
,,,,,,
"SOURCE:  U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.",,,,,,
,,,,,,
,,,,,,
,,,,,,
,,,,,,
,

,
,
,
,
,
,