Table 1-5: Oklahoma Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban,,,,,, (Miles),,,,,, ,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000 Interstate (total reported),209,209,207,208,209,209 Very good ,1,1,3,3,3,3 Good,26,26,59,61,55,55 Fair,57,57,44,43,49,49 Mediocre ,58,58,62,62,60,60 Poor,67,67,39,39,42,42 Not reported,0,0,0,0,0,0 ,,,,,, Other freeways and expressways (total reported),134,134,135,134,135,138 Very good ,0,0,0,0,0,0 Good,25,25,44,44,44,48 Fair,80,80,71,70,71,70 Mediocre ,22,23,17,17,17,17 Poor,6,6,3,3,3,3 Not reported,0,0,0,0,0,0 ,,,,,, Other principal arterial (total reported),807,802,800,801,797,798 Very good ,0,0,1,3,0,0 Good,55,55,69,69,63,64 Fair,401,396,364,359,357,362 Mediocre ,239,239,205,205,202,203 Poor,112,112,161,165,175,169 Not reported,1,1,1,1,5,11 ,,,,,, Urban minor arterial (total reported),N,N,N,N,N,"1,712" Very good ,N,N,N,N,N,0 Good,N,N,N,N,N,43 Fair,N,N,N,N,N,648 Mediocre ,N,N,N,N,N,499 Poor,N,N,N,N,N,522 Not reported,N,N,N,N,N,0 ,,,,,, Urban collector (total reported),N,N,N,N,N,855 Very good ,N,N,N,N,N,0 Good,N,N,N,N,N,6 Fair,N,N,N,N,N,116 Mediocre ,N,N,N,N,N,158 Poor,N,N,N,N,N,575 Not reported,N,N,N,N,N,N ,,,,,, KEY: N = data do not exist.,,,,,, ,,,,,, "NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.",,,,,, "NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting. ",,,,,, ,,,,,, "SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.",,,,,,