Home About ATSDR Press Room A-Z Index Glossary Employment Training Contact Us CDC  
ATSDR/DHHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Department of Health and Human Services ATSDR en Español

Search:

Toxic Substances and Health
 
Section Contents
 
Report Contents
 
Cover Page
Executive Summary
Introduction
Workshop Panelists
Background
Keynote Speeches
Panel One Results
Panel Two Results
Panel Three Results
Overarching Issues
Next Steps
References
Background Documents
Bibliography
There Is No Away!
Glossary
 
Risk Documents
 
Cancer Policy
Risk Assessment
Communication Primer
Evaluation Primer
Methyl Parathion
 
ATSDR Resources
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
Exposure Pathways
GATHER (GIS)
HazDat Database
Health Assessments
Health Statements
Interaction Profiles
Interactive Learning
Managing Incidents
Medical Guidelines
Minimal Risk Levels
Priority List
ToxFAQs™
ToxFAQs™ CABS
Toxicological Profiles
Toxicology Curriculum
 
External Resources
 
CDC
eLCOSH
EPA
Healthfinder®
Medline Plus
NCEH
NIEHS
NIOSH
OSHA
 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Psychological Responses to Hazardous Substances

Table of Contents


Cover Page

Executive Summary

Introduction

Panel One - Biomedical and Psychophysiological Effects

Panel Two - Community and Social Science Perspectives

Panel Three - Protecting and Promoting Psychosocial Health

Workshop Panelists

Background

Keynote Speeches

Panel One Results - Biomedical and Psychophysiological Effects

Composition

Charge

Topic One - What is known about the long-term health effects of chronically increased stress among individuals living near hazardous waste sites?

Topic Two - Are there certain neurobehavioral effects found in individuals exposed to chronic low-doses of toxins who live near hazardous waste sites that, if detected, could constitute sentinel health events at these sites? If they exist, can their early detection be used as an intervention screening tool?

Topic Three - What is known about how to clinically differentiate between organic behavioral disorders caused by exposure to certain neurotoxicants and purely psychologic responses to possible exposures? This discussion will consider methodological questions such as testing for stress and neurobehavioral effects as well as other issues.

Topic Four - Given what is known regarding the psychobiology of stress, are there interactions between chronic stress and exposure to neurotoxicants that could shift the dose-response curve for neurotoxins?

Topic Five - What is known about the proportion of individuals who are most sensitive to the uncertainty of possible exposures? This question includes consideration of populations who are medically, psychologically, and physiologically sensitive.

Panel Two Results - Community and Social Science Perspectives

Composition

Charge

Topic One - Are there factors (both internal and external) that might render some communities more or less susceptible to the stress of living near a hazardous waste site?

Topic Two - What are some of the psychosocial responses that communities have given to the stress of living near a hazardous waste site, and what have the results of those responses been?

Topic Three - Discuss how the human response to uncertainty may lead to different understandings of a possible exposure to a hazardous substance and its relationship to psychological responses such as learned helplessness.

Special Topic - What are the psychosocial effects of relocating a community when environmental contamination cannot be safely remediated?

Panel Three Results - Protecting and Promoting Psychosocial Health

Composition

Charge

Topic One - How has the extent of the psychosocial effects and possible public health impacts in these communities been assessed to date?

Topic Two - What previous prevention and therapeutic strategies have been used in these communities? What were the results of these interventions and what issues did they raise?

Topic Three - What methods are most effective in preventing the acute stress of learning of the existence of a hazardous waste site from becoming chronic in adults? In children?

Topic Four - What are the best methods to prevent demoralization fromm occurring in these communities?

Topic Five - How can seriously affected individuals be identified and appropriately referred in these communities?

Topic Six - What is the best method for increasing public and professional capacity to respond effectively to psychological issues related to hazardous waste sites?

Overarching Issues Discussed by All Three Panels

Topic One - Evaluate information about susceptible populations. This information may include preexisting conditions (i.e., medical and/or psychological), as well as individual variability in reactions to stress, cultural patterns of reaction to stress, and targeting interventions to vulnerable populations.

Topic Two - Examine the reports of increased incidence of psychologic disorders in these communities and make recommendations regarding the directions for future strategies.

Topic Three - What ethical concerns need to be addressed in dealing with the psychological responses to hazardous substances? This question addresses the appropriateness of various intervention strategies.

Topic Four - Identify future directions for investigation of the biopsychosocial effects from possible exposures to hazardous waste substances.

Next Steps

References

Background Documents

Panel One - Biomedical and Psychophysiological Effects

Panel Two - Community and Social Science Perspectives

Panel Three - Protecting and Promoting Psychosocial Health

Bibliography

There Is No Away!

Glossary

[Top of Page]


[Previous Section]

[Next Section]

September 1995