Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)
Printable Version

Table 1-4: South Dakota Road Condition by Functional System - Urban

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 44 49 36 47 50 49
Very good 1 5 0 0 0 1
Good 0 0 3 4 9 12
Fair 3 3 6 8 8 6
Mediocre 31 34 24 29 25 26
Poor 9 7 3 6 8 4
Not reported 5 0 13 3 0 0
Other freeways and expressways (total reported) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mediocre 0 0 0 0 0 0
Poor 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not reported 3 3 3 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 69 43 14 40 25 21
Very good 8 12 0 0 0 0
Good 1 0 8 7 8 4
Fair 31 16 5 21 12 13
Mediocre 17 8 1 4 4 3
Poor 12 7 0 8 1 1
Not reported 43 71 102 92 110 111
Urban minor arterial (total reported) N N N N N N
Very good N N N N N N
Good N N N N N N
Fair N N N N N N
Mediocre N N N N N N
Poor N N N N N N
Not reported N N N N N N
Urban collector (total reported) N N N N N N
Very good N N N N N N
Good N N N N N N
Fair N N N N N N
Mediocre N N N N N N
Poor N N N N N N
Not reported N N N N N N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.