Table 5-5: Highway Congestion in the 50 Largest Urban Areas: 2003,,,,,,,,,,,,
(Ranked by hours of delay per person),,,,,,,,,,,,
Urban area,Rank,,Population (thousands),,Hours of delay (thousands),,Hours of delay per person,,Cost of congestion ($ millions),,Cost of congestion per person ($),
"Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA",1,,"12,500",,"623,796",,50,,"10,686",,855,
"San Francisco-Oakland, CA",2,,"4,125",,"152,352",,37,,"2,604",,631,
"Houston, TX",3,,"3,750",,"135,652",,36,,"2,283",,609,
"Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX",4,,"4,300",,"151,840",,35,,"2,545",,592,
"Atlanta, GA",5,,"3,005",,"103,618",,34,,"1,754",,584,
"Washinton, DC-VA-MD",6,,"4,270",,"145,484",,34,,"2,465",,577,
"Chicago, IL-IN",7,,"8,125",,"252,822",,31,,"4,274",,526,
"Denver-Aurora, CO",8,,"2,050",,"64,506",,31,,"1,087",,530,
"Detroit, MI",9,,"4,050",,"119,581",,30,,"2,019",,499,
"Orlando, FL",10,,"1,260",,"38,156",,30,,643,,510,
"Riverside-San Bernardino, CA",11,,"1,670",,"50,155",,30,,864,,517,
"Miami, FL",12,,"5,100",,"147,293",,29,,"2,485",,487,
"San Jose, CA",13,,"1,675",,"48,134",,29,,823,,492,
"San Diego, CA",14,,"2,870",,"81,756",,28,,"1,411",,492
"Austin, TX",15,,855,,"23,201",,27,,391,,457
"Baltimore, MD",16,,"2,310",,"62,436",,27,,"1,057",,458
"Phoenix, AZ",17,,"3,005",,"76,662",,26,,"1,295",,431
"Boston, MA-NH-RI",18,,"3,990",,"100,237",,25,,"1,692",,424
"Seattle, WA",19,,"2,900",,"72,461",,25,,"1,238",,427
"Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL",20,,"2,050",,"51,359",,25,,865,,422
"Charlotte, NC-SC",21,,725,,"16,692",,23,,282,,389
"Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN",22,,"2,475",,"57,538",,23,,975,,394
"New York-Newark, NY-NJ-CT",23,,"17,700",,"404,480",,23,,"6,780",,383
"Louisville, KY-IN",24,,890,,"19,916",,22,,336,,377
"Sacramento, CA",25,,"1,655",,"35,929",,22,,620,,374
"Indianapolis, IN",26,,"1,035",,"21,358",,21,,362,,350
"Philadelphia, PA-NJ-DE-MD",27,,"5,285",,"112,309",,21,,"1,885",,357
"Nashville-Davidson, TN",28,,960,,"18,890",,20,,317,,331
"Portland, OR-WA",29,,"1,670",,"33,387",,20,,569,,341
"St. Louis, MO-IL",30,,"2,075",,"39,936",,19,,675,,326
"Tucson, AZ",31,,720,,"13,767",,19,,234,,324
"Jacksonville, FL",32,,925,,"16,850",,18,,284,,308
"Memphis, TN-MS-AR",33,,995,,"17,465",,18,,293,,295
"Oxnard-Ventura, CA",34,,575,,"10,249",,18,,177,,307
"Providence, RI-MA",35,,"1,230",,"21,668",,18,,363,,295
"San Antonio, TX",36,,"1,330",,"23,789",,18,,401,,301
"Bridgeport-Stamford, CT-NY",37,,860,,"14,550",,17,,250,,291
"Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN",38,,"1,605",,"27,288",,17,,461,,287
"Albuquerque, NM",39,,580,,"9,258",,16,,156,,269
"Columbus, OH",40,,"1,190",,"18,550",,16,,314,,264
"Las Vegas, NV",41,,"1,360",,"22,245",,16,,379,,279
"Salt Lake City, UT",42,,920,,"15,094",,16,,257,,279
"Raleigh-Durham, NC",43,,785,,"11,482",,15,,194,,248
"Birmingham, AL",44,,680,,"9,704",,14,,165,,242
"Charleston-North Charleston, SC",45,,470,,"6,364",,14,,107,,228
"Colorado Springs, CO",46,,480,,"6,953",,14,,117,,243,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"Virginia Beach, VA",47,,"1,535",,"21,746",,14,,368,,239,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"Milwaukee, WI",48,,"1,450",,"18,249",,13,,310,,214,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"Omaha, NE-IA",49,,635,,"7,984",,13,,135,,211,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"Honolulu, HI",50,,700,,"7,476",,11,,128,,184,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"SOURCE: Texas Transportation Institute, The 2005 Urban Mobility Study, College Station, TX: 2005, available at http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/ as of Dec. 18, 2006.",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,