Home About ATSDR Press Room A-Z Index Glossary Employment Training Contact Us CDC  
ATSDR/DHHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Department of Health and Human Services ATSDR en Español

Search:

Toxic Substances and Health
 
Report Contents
 
Charge to the Panel
Panel Members
 
Fate & Biomonitoring
 
Sampling Methodologies
Health Endpoints
Susceptible Populations
Exposure Evaluation
Biomonitoring
 
Correlation of Data
 
Risk Management
 
Relocation Criteria
 
Reference Doses
 
Decontamination
 
Recommendations
 
Clinical Evaluation
 
Appropriate Triggers
Health Status
Environmental Medicine
 
Evaluation Protocol
 
Standardizing Lab Data
Treatment
Neurobehavioral Effects
Acute Poisoning
Suggested Evaluation
 
Overarching Issues
 
Recommendations
Field Survey
7-day Study
Dermal Absorption
Subchronic Toxicity
Pilot Study
Cohort Study
 
Selected References
 
Risk Communication
 
Workgroup
Recommendations
Operating Procedures
Management & Planning
Limitations of Strategies
Planning Steps
Identifying Populations
Preventing Exposures
Research Needs
Conclusions
 
Risk Documents
 
Cancer Policy
Risk Assessment
Communication Primer
Evaluation Primer
Psychologial Responses
 
ATSDR Resources
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
Exposure Pathways
GATHER (GIS)
HazDat Database
Health Assessments
Health Statements
Interaction Profiles
Interactive Learning
Managing Incidents
Medical Guidelines
Minimal Risk Levels
Priority List
ToxFAQs™
ToxFAQs™ CABS
Toxicological Profiles
Toxicology Curriculum
 
External Resources
 
CDC
eLCOSH
EPA
Healthfinder®
Medline Plus
NCEH
NIEHS
NIOSH
OSHA
 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Methyl Parathion Expert Panel Report
Literature Resources


  1. Chess, C. et al. 1994. Proceedings of a national symposium on risk communication: Next steps for government agencies. Risk Analysis.
  2. Chess, C., and Hance, B.J. 1994. Communicating with the public: Ten questions environmental managers should ask. [brochure]. Center for Environmental Communication, Rutgers University, New Brunswick: New Jersey.
  3. Claudio, L. 1996. New efforts to address childhood asthma in the Bronx. Environmental Health Perspectives 104:1028-1029.
  4. Claudio, L. 1997. Increasing minority participation in environmental health sciences. Environmental Health Perspectives 105:174-176.
  5. Claudio L., Torres T., Sanjurjo E., Sherman L., and Landrigan P.J. 1997. Environmental health sciences education: A tool for achieving environmental equity and protecting children. Environmental Health Perspectives (In press).
  6. Fisher, A., Pavlova, M., and Covello, V. Eds. 1991. Evaluating risk communication programs: A catalogue of 'quick and easy' feedback methods. In Evaluation and Effective Risk Communications Workshop Proceedings, 45-61. Washington, DC: Interagency Task Force on Environmental Cancer and Heart and Lung Disease.
  7. Hance, B.J. and Chess, C. 1994. Planning successful risk communication: A training module for agency managers and staff. [Video]. (Available from the Center for Environmental Communication, Rutgers University, New Brunswick: New Jersey).
  8. Hance, B.J., Chess, C., and Sandman, P.M. 1988. Improving dialogue with communities: A risk communication manual for government. Division of Science and Research, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.
  9. Johnson, B.B. 1993. Advancing understanding of knowledge's role in lay risk perception. Risk Issues in Health & Safety 190-212.
  10. National Research Council. 1996. Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society (P.C. Stern and H.V. Fineberg, eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  11. Ortolano, L., and Wagner, T.P. 1977. Field evaluation of some public involvement techniques. Water Resources Bulletin 1131-1139.
  12. Pflugh, K.K., Shaw, J.A., and Johnson, B.B. 1992. A guide to effective communication planning. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, ed. Trenton, New Jersey.
  13. Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. 1997. Framework for environmental health risk management. Washington, DC: Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management.
  14. Rosener, J.B. 1981. User-oriented evaluation: A new way to view citizen participation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Studies 17(4):583-596.
  15. Slovic, P. 1993. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis 13(6):675-682.
  16. Wandersman, A., and Hallman, W.K. 1993. Are people acting irrationally? Understanding public concerns about environmental threats. American Psychologist 48(6): 681-686.
  17. Weinstein, N.D. 1989. Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science 1232-1233.
  18. Wynne, B. 1989. Sheep farming after Chernobyl: A case study in communicating scientific information. Environment 10-15, 33-39.

Top of Page