[Federal Register: September 16, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 180)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 53378-53383]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16se08-7]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2007-0836-200739(a); FRL-8714-8]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Florida;
Removal of Gasoline Vapor Recovery From Southeast Florida Areas
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Florida (Florida) on May 31, 2007, for the
purpose of removing Stage II vapor control requirements for new and
upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities in Dade, Broward, and Palm
Beach Counties (hereafter refer to as the ``Southeast Florida Area''),
and to phase out Stage II requirements for existing facilities in those
counties. In addition, EPA is approving this SIP revision which
requires new and upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities and new bulk
gasoline plants statewide to employ Stage I vapor control systems, and
phases in Stage I vapor control requirements statewide for existing
gasoline dispensing facilities.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective November 17, 2008 without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by October 16,
2008. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2007-0836, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: lesane.heidi@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562-9019.
4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2007-0836,'' Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Heidi LeSane, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OAR-
2007-0836. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or e-
mail, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center home
page at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning
[[Page 53379]]
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding
federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heidi LeSane, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404)
562-9074. Ms. LeSane can also be reached via electronic mail at
lesane.heidi@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Effective January 6, 1992, EPA under the Clean Air Act Amendments
of 1990 (CAA or ``the Act''), designated and classified the three-
county Southeast Florida Area consisting of Palm Beach, Broward, and
Dade Counties as a ``moderate'' ozone nonattainment area. (56 FR
56694). The designation was based on the area's 1-hour ozone design
value, 138 parts per billion (ppb), for the three-year period 1987-
1989. Pursuant to the requirements of section 182(b)(3) of the CAA, the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) developed Florida
Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Rule 62-252.400, Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities--Stage II Vapor Recovery, and submitted the rule to EPA for
approval as part of Florida's ozone SIP. The rule was adopted by FDEP
effective February 2, 1993, and approved by EPA effective April 25,
1994 (59 FR 13883). Under the State rule, new gasoline dispensing
facilities built after November 15, 1992, were required to employ Stage
II systems upon start-up; existing facilities were required to install
Stage II systems by specific dates ranging from June 30, 1993, to
November 15, 1994.
On November 8, 1993, having implemented all measures required of
the State to that date for moderate ozone nonattainment areas under the
CAA, and with three years of data (1990-1992) showing compliance with
the 1-hour ozone standard, FDEP submitted to EPA an ozone maintenance
plan and request for redesignation of the Southeast Florida Area to
attainment status. The maintenance plan, as required under section 175A
of the CAA, showed that nitrogen oxides (NOX) and volatile
organic compound (VOC) emissions in the area would remain below the
1990 ``attainment year'' levels throughout the ten-year period from
1995 to 2005. In making these projections, FDEP factored in the
emissions benefit (primarily VOCs) of the area's Stage II program,
thereby expressing the State's intent to maintain this program as part
of its 1-hour ozone SIP. The redesignation request and maintenance plan
were approved by EPA, effective April 25, 1995 (60 FR 10325).
Subsequently, the maintenance plan was extended by FDEP to 2015 and
approved by EPA, effective April 13, 2004 (69 FR 7127).
On April 6, 1994, EPA promulgated regulations requiring the phase-
in of on-board refueling vapor recovery (ORVR) systems on new motor
vehicles. Under Section 202(a)(6) of the CAA, moderate ozone
nonattainment areas are not required to implement Stage II vapor
recovery programs after promulgation of ORVR standards. Since the
Southeast Florida Stage II program was already in place and had been
included in the State's November 8, 1993, redesignation request and 1-
hour ozone maintenance plan for the area, FDEP elected not to remove
the program from the SIP at that time.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Phase I implementation rule for the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard, at 40 CFR 51.905(4), requires that any ``applicable
requirement'' under the 1-hour ozone SIP, if rescinded, be retained
as a contingency measure in the 8-hour ozone SIP. However, since the
Southeast Florida Stage II vapor recovery program ceased to be an
``applicable requirement'' upon EPA's promulgation of the ORVR
standards in 1994, the State is not obligated, and is not proposing,
to retain the program as a contingency measure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Analysis of State's Submittal
A. Requested Removal of Stage II Requirements
EPA's primary consideration for determining the approvability of
Florida's request to remove Stage II vapor control requirements for new
and upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities in the Southeast Florida
Area, and for the phase out of Stage II requirements for existing
facilities in those counties is whether this requested action complies
with section 110(l) of the CAA. Below is EPA's analysis of these
considerations.
1. Federal Requirements for Stage II
As a result of the 1990 CAA amendments, states were required to
adopt Stage II rules for all areas classified as ``moderate'' or worse
under section 182(b)(3) of the CAA. In addition, Section 202(a)(6) of
the CAA required EPA to promulgate Onboard Vapor Recovery standards.
Section 202(a)(6) further provides that ``the requirements of section
182(b)(3) (relating to Stage II gasoline vapor recovery) for areas
classified under section 181 as moderate for ozone shall not apply
after promulgation of such standards.'' Onboard Refueling Vapor
Recovery (ORVR) regulations were promulgated by EPA on April 6, 1994
(see, 59 FR 16262, 40 CFR 86.001 and 40 CFR 86.098). As a result, the
CAA no longer requires moderate areas to impose Stage II controls under
section 182(b)(3), and such areas may seek SIP revisions to remove such
requirements from their SIPs, subject to section 110(l) of the Act.
Section 110(l) of the CAA, states:
Plan Revision--Each revision to an implementation plan submitted
by a State under this Chapter shall be adopted by such State after
reasonable notice and public hearing. The Administrator shall not
approve a revision of a plan if the revision would interfere with
any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress (as defined in section 7501 of this title), or any
other applicable requirement of this Chapter.
As such, Florida must make demonstration of noninterference to remove
Stage II from the SIP for the Southeast Florida area. EPA's policy
memoranda related to ORVR, dated March 9, 1993, and June 23, 1993,
provided further guidance on an allowance for removing stage II
requirements from certain areas.
2. Southeast Florida's Air Quality Status
On April 30, 2004, EPA published the nonattainment and attainment
designations for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard (69 FR 23857). The
Southeast Florida Area was determined to be in attainment for the 8-
hour ozone standard. With regard to the 1-hour and 8-hour ozone NAAQS,
Southeast Florida is still in attainment and has provided monitoring
data in the submittal for both standards through 2006 which
demonstrates this attainment. Compliance with the 8-hour ozone standard
is demonstrated at 84 ppb and for the 1-hour ozone standard, compliance
was demonstrated at 124 ppb. For the period of 2004-2006, the 8-hour
ozone design value was 70 ppb, and the 1-hour ozone design value was 92
ppb.
On January 5, 2005, EPA published nonattainment and attainment
designations for the PM2.5 standard (70 FR 944). The
Southeast Florida Area was designated as attainment for the
PM2.5 standard and has remained in attainment through 2006.
Compliance for the current PM2.5 annual standard is
[[Page 53380]]
15 micro-grams per cubic meter ([mu]g/m\3\). The annual
PM2.5 design value for Southeast Florida for the period of
2004-2006 was 9.5 [mu]g/m\3\.
On October 17, 2006, EPA promulgated a revised NAAQS for
PM2.5. The effective date for the new standard was December
18, 2006. EPA retained the annual PM2.5 standard of 15
[mu]g/m\3\ and revised the 24-hour PM2.5 standard, changing
it from 65 [mu]g/m\3\ to 35 [mu]g/m\3\. FDEP submitted a letter dated
December 12, 2007, which recommended that the entire State of Florida
be designated as attainment for PM2.5.
Although the Southeast Florida Area is in attainment for the 1-hour
ozone, 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 standards, section 110(l)
still requires that this area demonstrate noninterference for any SIP
revision related to these standards.
On March 12, 2008, EPA strengthened its NAAQS for ground-level
ozone, the primary component of smog. These changes will improve
protection of both public health and sensitive trees and plants. EPA is
revising the 8-hour ``primary'' ozone standard, designed to protect
public health, to a level of 0.075 parts per million (ppm). The
previous standard, set in 1997, was 0.08 ppm. The Southeast Florida
Area 8-hour ozone standard design values for the years 2004-2006 are as
follows: 0.072 ppm for Dade, 0.066 ppm for Broward and 0.066 ppm for
Palm Beach. These levels are below both the 1997 8-hour ozone standard
and the 2008 8-hour ozone standard.
3. Noninterference Demonstration for Removal of Stage II
Removing the Stage II vapor recovery requirement from the Southeast
Florida Area's portion of the Florida SIP may result in a small,
temporary increase in VOC emissions within the three Southeast Florida
counties. However, as explained below, implementation of the ORVR
requirements ensures noninterference with the NAAQS. The following
table shows the expected emission changes in comparison with the
emissions that would occur if the Stage II vapor recovery requirement
were to remain in force.
Table 1--VOC Emissions From Vehicle Refueling (Stage II)
[Tons per day (tpd)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 2010 2015
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With Stage II With Stage II Without Stage II With Stage II Without Stage II
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miami-Dade.......................................... 1.43 1.04 3.22 0.87 2.04
Broward............................................. 1.26 0.92 2.86 0.78 1.81
Palm Beach.......................................... 0.95 0.71 2.19 0.61 1.42
SE Florida Total.................................... 3.64 2.67 8.27 2.26 5.27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA's analysis involved a comparison of the VOC emissions
attributed to the Stage II program (see, Table 1 above) to the total
VOC emissions projected for the Southeast Florida Area in the most
recent 1-hour ozone maintenance plan \2\ (see Table 2 below).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Air Quality Maintenance Plan (2005-2015) Dade, Broward, Palm
Beach Counties, December 2002.
Table 2--Total VOC \3\ Emissions From Southeast Florida Area With & Without Vehicle Refueling (Stage II)
[tpd]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1990 2005 2010 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Without Stage II With Stage II With Stage II Without Stage II With Stage II Without Stage II
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miami-Dade.................................. 399.8 208.3 200.0 202.1 191.6 192.8
Broward..................................... 239.6 154.6 145.3 147.2 135.9 136.9
Palm Beach.................................. 228.4 149.7 143.2 144.7 136.7 137.5
SE Florida Total............................ 867.8 512.6 488.4 494.0 464.2 467.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since 1990, the year that the Southeast Florida Area came into
attainment with the 1-hour standard, VOC emissions from all sources
have continued to decline. From a 1990 value of 867.8 tpd, VOC
emissions decreased to 512.6 tpd in 2005. As a result of turnover of
the vehicle fleet and other programs designed to reduce emissions, VOC
emissions in the Southeast Florida Area are expected to further decline
to 488.4 tpd and 464.2 tpd in 2010 and 2015, respectively, if the Stage
II vapor recovery program is continued (and does not produce ORVR
incompatibility-related excess emissions). Without credit for the Stage
II program, the VOC emissions would potentially be 494.0 tpd in 2010
and 467.2 tpd in 2015, which is still below current levels and well
below the 1990 attainment-year emissions ``ceiling.'' Thus, the
additional emissions that may result from the phase-out of the Stage II
program do not appear to compromise continued attainment of the former
1-hour ozone standard or the more restrictive 8-hour ozone standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The total VOC emissions in this area also include a biogenic
component that is assumed constant over time. The biogenic VOC
emissions for the individual counties are estimated at 211.3 tpd for
Miami-Dade, 174.5 tpd for Broward, and 399.6 tpd for Palm Beach.
These amounts can be added to the man-made emissions to get the
total VOC emissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any VOC emissions increase that may result from the phase out of
the Stage II program is not expected to cause a violation of the 8-hour
ozone standard in the Southeast Florida Area. An analogous emissions
ceiling for maintenance of the 8-hour standard can be approximated.
Although the three-county Southeast Florida Area has never violated the
8-hour standard, the years 1988 and 1989 had the closest design values
to the level of the standard (84 ppb and 83 ppb, respectively). Since
VOC emissions have steadily decreased over the last two decades,
emissions in 1988 and 1989 were greater than 1990 emissions. Thus, the
1990 attainment-
[[Page 53381]]
year emissions ceiling, as determined for the 1-hour standard,
represents a reasonable emissions ceiling for maintenance of the 8-hour
standard, and the logic given above for noninterference with
maintenance of the former 1-hour standard applies also to the current
8-hour standard. As mentioned previously in this rulemaking, the
Southeast Florida Area has current monitoring data that demonstrates
attainment with the 8-hour ozone standard.
It is expected that the removal of the Stage II gasoline vapor
recovery program in the Southeast Florida Area will not interfere with
continued compliance with the PM2.5 standard. EPA's review
of the available information indicates that sulfates and carbon make up
approximately 70 percent of the precursors for PM2.5
formation in Florida. As mentioned previously in this rulemaking, the
Southeast Florida Area has current monitoring data that demonstrates
attainment with both the annual and the daily PM2.5
standards.
Based on the factors mentioned above, EPA believes that Florida's
demonstration to remove the Stage II requirement from the Florida SIP
for the Southeast Florida Area is consistent with section 110(l) of the
CAA and will not interfere with compliance for the new NAAQS in the
Southeast Florida Area.
B. Requested Approval of Statewide Stage I Vapor Control Requirements
Florida's Stage I vapor recovery is currently required for gasoline
dispensing facilities in the seven counties designated as maintenance
areas for ozone (Duval, Orange, Hillsborough, Pinellas, Palm Beach,
Broward, and Miami-Dade). In addition to removing Stage II requirements
for Southeast Florida, this SIP revision will require Stage I vapor
recovery at new and upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities statewide;
phase in Stage I vapor recovery statewide for existing gasoline
dispensing facilities not previously required to have Stage I; and
require tanker trucks and trailers to ensure connection of the vapor
return line at facilities equipped for Stage I vapor recovery
statewide. The phase-in of Stage I vapor control on a statewide basis
will likely result in a net reduction in air pollutant transport across
Florida's borders.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the SIP revision submitted by the State of Florida
for the purpose of removing Stage II vapor control requirements for new
and upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities in Miami-Dade, Broward, and
Palm Beach Counties, and phasing out Stage II requirements for existing
facilities in those counties. EPA is also approving rule changes which
would require new and upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities and new
bulk gasoline plants statewide to employ Stage I vapor control systems,
and it would phase in Stage I vapor control requirements statewide for
existing gasoline dispensing facilities. This SIP revision includes
changes to F.A.C. Chapters 62-210.200 Definitions, 62-210.310 Air
General Permits, 62-210.920 Air General Permit Forms, 62-252.200
Definitions, 62-252.300 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities--Stage I Vapor
Recovery, 62-252.400 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities--Stage II Vapor
Recovery, 62-252.500 Gasoline Tanker Trucks, 62-296-418 Bulk Gasoline
Plants, and 62-296.509 Bulk Gasoline Plants (Repealed).
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a non-controversial submittal and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective November 17,
2008 without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments
by October 16, 2008.
If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on November 17, 2008 and no
further action will be taken on the proposed rule.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in
[[Page 53382]]
the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days
after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 17, 2008. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: August 29, 2008.
Russell L. Wright, Jr.
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart K Florida
0
2. Section 52.520(c) is amended by:
0
a. Revising entries for ``62-210.200'', ``62-210.300'', ``62-252.200'',
``62-252.300'', ``62-252.400'', ``62-252.500'', ``62-296.509'' and
0
b. Adding entries for ``62-210.310'', ``62-210.920'', and ``62-
296.418'' to read as follows:
52.520 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Florida Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 62-210 Stationary Sources--General Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
62-210.200................. Definitions.......... 9/4/06 9/16/08
[Insert citation of
publication].
* * * * * * *
62-210.300................. Permits Required..... 9/4/06 9/16/08
[Insert citation of
publication].
62-210.310................. Air General Permits.. 9/4/06 9/16/08
[Insert citation of
publication].
* * * * * * *
62-210.920................. Air General Permit 9/4/06 9/16/08
Forms. [Insert citation of
publication].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 62-252 Gasoline Vapor Control
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
62-252.200................. Definitions.......... 9/4/06 9/16/08
[Insert citation of
publication].
62-252.300................. Gasoline Dispensing 9/4/06 9/16/08
Facilities--Stage I [Insert citation of
Vapor Recovery. publication].
62-252.400................. Gasoline Dispensing 9/4/06 9/16/08
Facilities--Stage II [Insert citation of
Vapor Recovery. publication].
62-252.500................. Gasoline Tanker 9/4/06 9/16/08
Trucks. [Insert citation of
publication].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 62-296 Stationary Sources--Emission Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
62-296.418................. Bulk Gasoline Plants. 9/4/06 9/16/08
[Insert citation of
publication].
* * * * * * *
62-296.509................. Bulk Gasoline Plants. .............. ..................... Repealed.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 53383]]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-21303 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P