![]() |
U.S. Department of Labor | ![]() |
||||
Occupational Safety & Health Administration |
![]() |
Standard Interpretations
06/15/2000 - Use of height adjustable beds help reduce back injuries during patient care. |
![]() |
June 15, 2000 Ms. Alice Freund Health and Safety Advisor Service Employees International Union 50 Charles Lindbergh Boulevard, Suite 602 Uniondale, New York 11553-3650 Dear Ms. Freund: Thank you for your December 3, 1999 letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requesting a "written opinion from OSHA on whether ... working on your knees in a nursing home is unsafe." You are specifically concerned with the use of mattresses placed on the floor or very low beds that are not height adjustable. This is done to reduce residents' risk for falling out of bed. Employees who care for residents placed close to the floor perform a number of work tasks. These tasks include, but are not limited to:
There are a number of controls that have been successfully implemented to reduce injuries and illnesses in nursing homes. A lifting device is one method of reducing employee exposure. The type and number of lift devices would depend upon the needs of the facility. In fact, some nursing homes have experienced significant declines in injury and illness rates as a result of moving towards "zero-lift" work environments. However, tasks such as administering medication, securing "slips" or "gait belts," and placing pads under a resident located near to the floor would still require the employee to kneel on the mattress while reaching around to the resident. A more effective method of preventing the need for the employee to work in a kneeling position would be to use height adjustable electric beds that can be raised from the floor level to approximately the waist height of the employees. This type of bed allows the worker to lift and transfer residents with less forward flexion of the torso. The recommendations provided in this letter are advisory in nature and informational in content. It is intended as a response to your specific questions and not appropriate for every workplace. Failure to implement the specific recommendations in this letter does not, in itself constitute a violation of Section 5(a)(1) (the General Duty Clause) of the OSH Act of 1970. The General Duty Clause requires each employer to furnish to each employee employment and a place of employment free from recognized hazards which are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees. Employers can be cited for violation of the General Duty Clause if a recognized serious hazard exists in their workplace and the employer does not take reasonable steps to prevent or abate the hazard. The information contained in this letter is not considered a substitute for any provision of the OSH Act or any standard issued by OSHA. Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. Sincerely, Charles N. Jeffress Assistant Secretary [Corrected 10/22/2004] |
![]() |
![]() |
www.osha.gov | www.dol.gov |
Contact Us | Freedom of Information Act | Customer Survey Privacy and Security Statement | Disclaimers |
||
Occupational Safety & Health Administration 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20210 |