|
|
Booster
Seat Promotion Program
Nassau County, New York
Project Type: Multifaceted community outreach,
education, and distribution of booster seats to low-income families
State Law at Time of Project Implementation: New
York State did not require booster seat use during the time that
the project was implemented. New York State's Occupant Restraint
Law stipulated that all children younger than age 4 must be restrained
in a child safety seat that meets Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
213. Children younger than age 10 riding in the back seat are required
to wear safety belts. This law also specifies primary safety belt
use enforcement. Legislation has been introduced requiring the use
of booster or child safety seats for children who are younger than
7 years of age or weigh less than 70 pounds.
Purpose: To conduct a public education and outreach
program with an emphasis on reaching target audiences in low-income
areas to increase the use of booster seats in Nassau County, New
York.
Primary Audience(s): Healthcare providers, safety
and law enforcement personnel, educators, child safety seat retailers,
childcare and Head Start personnel, families and children, senior
citizens, and private-sector employers
Project Reach: Nassau County, New York
Project Description: This project used a community-based
approach with a special emphasis on outreach to intermediaries who
could educate their constituents about booster seat use. Various
direct and indirect communications strategies were used, including
lectures, presentations, workshops, contests, and child safety seat
inspection events. The distribution of booster seats and written
information on booster seat use through public and private venues
was an integral part of the project.
Key Project Elements: Though listed sequentially,
implementation of these elements occurred at different times throughout
the project:
- Collected questionnaires and surveys from childcare workers,
physicians, other healthcare workers, and car rental companies.
Observational surveys were conducted of children (4- to 8-year-olds),
child passenger injury data were collected, and five focus groups
were conducted to test perceptions of booster seat use and nonuse.
- Educated health-related professionals through workshops,
lectures, interviews, presentations
during grand rounds at hospitals, presentations at professional
meetings,
and one-on-one meetings.
- Distributed pamphlets, brochures, programming suggestions,
and other types of
written information on child safety seats to all intermediary groups.
- Conducted a children's booster seat contest through
the schools, childcare centers,
libraries, and toy stores. Children were asked to observe and record
the restraint
status of 4- to 8-year-old children in other cars.
- Provided pamphlets to the leading child safety seat retailers
and offered CPS training
to their employees.
- Facilitated CPS training for police officers.
- Conducted child passenger safety inspection events and established
additional
county child safety seat fitting stations.
- Conducted extensive media outreach. Gave interviews to local
news stations and
cable TV programs. Persuaded local newspapers and national and local
magazines
to include feature articles.
- Distributed booster seats to low-income families.
- Began preliminary work on the creation of a web site to
provide countywide injury
prevention information and data (done in collaboration with New
York State).
Qualitative
Research Findings: This project used a variety of qualitative
research methods to document project activities. Generalizations
based on the study reports are listed below:
Factors influencing target audience (intermediaries) advocacy
of booster seat use
- Physicians visited personally by the grant administrator
were interested and
informed.
- Because law enforcement professionals have their own training
programs, they
are already receptive to information on CPS and are open to expanding
their
efforts on CPS promotion.
- Childcare providers and educators who received brochures
on child passenger
safety demonstrated interest in using the information (multiple
followup
requests for additional information were received).
Factors
that prevented target audience (intermediaries) advocacy of booster
seat use
- Many healthcare professionals do not maintain memberships
with professional
associations; therefore, use of these organizations may be ineffective
as vehicles
for distribution of information to these audiences.
- Time constraints experienced by healthcare professionals,
along with attitudinal
resistance (physicians dismissing health-related information from
nonphysicians,
negative about office solicitors) reduced their level of receptivity
for information
provided by this project.
- High staff turnover in retail organizations precluded educating
all those working
with child safety seats.
- Use of contests at schools depended on the principal's
interest (usually low).
Those contests that were held were labor intensive to organize and
promote.
Factors affecting booster seat distribution and use
- Childcare centers serving low- to middle-income families were
effective venues for distributing seats and information, as evidenced
by their continued use. Conversely, health department clinics
were not as successful. The very low-income status of clients
and "chaotic" family conditions were cited as negative factors.
Project Evaluation Methods: Attitudinal and observational
surveys were used at the outset of the project to establish baseline
measures. Evaluation methods employed in this study were primarily
process oriented. Numbers of informational briefings given, numbers
of brochures distributed, media appearances, and other process measurements
were used as appropriate for each type of outreach and audience.
Back to Top
Key
Programmatic Findings and Lessons Learned
- Some physicians and other healthcare professionals will
respond only to outreach
efforts by "credentialed" individuals. As a result,
these groups are more labor intensive
to activate as advocates. However, once educated, physicians can
become an
increasingly important source of child passenger safety information
for families of
young children.
- Target audiences who already see public safety and/or child
advocacy as their
responsibility are the most receptive to booster seat advocacy.
- Offering CPS workshops through the local Childcare Council
was very effective.
Childcare workers needing recertification in New York have a higher
incentive to learn about booster seat use.
- Two major interrelated factors influence the effectiveness
of organizations
that work with low-income families to serve as booster seat
advocates. One factor is the nature of their client contact (routine
or emergency). The other factor is the organization's ability
(sufficient
staff and commitment) to follow through with education on the
proper use of child safety seats.
- Connections with established community and professional
groups
(AAA, Childcare Council, Traffic Safety Board) strongly contributed
to
the success of outreach efforts.
Back to Top
|