|
Statement of Plug Power Inc., Latham, New York
My
name is Dr. Roger Saillant, President and CEO of Plug Power Inc., a Latham, NY-based company that is a leader in the development
of on-site energy systems utilizing proton exchange membrane (“PEM”) fuel cells
for stationary power, emergency backup power and material handling
applications. Plug Power espouses the values of sustainability and is
developing and commercializing fuel cell systems that contribute to the United States’ energy independence.
Plug Power would like to
thank the Members of the Committee for the opportunity to submit testimony in
favor of including commercial and residential fuel cell credit extensions in
the energy legislation being advocated by Congressional Leadership. Also, let
me thank you for your initiation of these credits in the Energy Policy Act of
2005 and for providing a one-year extension of the credits last year.
We have been advocating tax
credits for fuel cells in both residential and commercial use since 1999 and
have been working closely with our Congressman, Michael McNulty, who has
introduced legislation in each Congress since that time. Thanks in large part
to Rep. McNulty’s steadfast leadership, and to the support in this Committee,
today we have the credit in existing tax code.
Fuel cell tax credits
currently in existence are critical for our fledgling industry. This credit
targets stationary and portable fuel cell technologies and it has been our
intention that the credits apply to all non-mobile applications that meet the
credit criteria of efficiency and size. These applications are the precursors
to the fuel cell vehicle and a low or no-carbon transportation and energy
generation future. In fact, at Plug Power, our vision is one of a sustainable
and renewable future, and we believe that such a future cannot occur without
fuel cell conversion devices. Renewable energy sources are, unfortunately, not
readily adaptable to the transportation market, but through fuel cells, can
supply that motive power. In addition, some renewable energy sources are
intermittent, and fuel cells allow for the storage and use of that energy power
at all times.
Plug Power support H.R. 550
and its companion bill S. 590, the Securing America’s Future Act. This bill
extends both the fuel cell and solar tax credits and provides those credits
though 2016. The long term nature of the fuel cell credit is critical. First,
it recognizes the evolution of the range of fuel cell technologies and
products. This is not akin to providing a credit for a “highly efficient
motor”. It is more like a credit for highly efficient motors, power
generators, battery replacements, forklifts, back up power units, critical load
providers, loaders, and so on. You get the idea: fuel cells need a long term
credit because we are talking about a VERY wide variety of products.
The long term nature of the
credit is also important because it allows us to: reduce our manufacturing
costs, invest in our manufacturing facilities with confidence, give security to
our manufacturing base, build confidence in our supply base, and importantly,
provide time for the long term planning that is often involved in building and
siting fuel cell technologies. Like solar, we have some large scale systems
and/or some aggregations of systems that takes a long time to gain approvals
and otherwise be ready for installation.
H.R. 550 also calls for
relief from the Alternative Minimum Tax, which some of our commercial credit
customers have requested. Ours is a fledgling industry but one in which there
are at least 30 products now available. We must find ways to get our fuel cell
systems into customer hands, and the tax credit is proving to be a very
valuable tool. We believe that, once customers have enough experience with
fuel cell systems, they will want to use them to replace existing, and in many
cases, inferior technologies. We cannot rely on the credit as a tool for
gaining experience with fuel cells if our customers cannot even take advantage
of that credit.
For the fuel cell portion of
H.R. 550, it continues to allow telecommunications customers to take advantage
of the credit. We support the continuation of this provision.
We are very encouraged by the
support of H.R. 550 to date and urge its passage as part of any comprehensive
energy legislation. The credit of 30% capped at $500 per half kilowatt is just
enough to encourage cost reductions and leverage early sales, yet not so much
that we are installing technologies that are not yet ready for commercial
introduction.
Again, Plug Power thanks you
for the opportunity to provide testimony and for your support to date of fuel
cell tax credits.
FUEL
CELL DESCRIPTION
A
fuel cell is an on-site power generation system that electrochemically combines
hydrogen with oxygen in the air to form electricity. Hydrogen fuel can be
generated by electrolyzing water with low-cost off-peak electricity, or with
electricity obtained from renewable sources such as solar, wind, or biomass.
This makes such fuel cell systems highly efficient as well as environmentally
friendly. The heart of stationary or portable PEM fuel cell system is the
stack, which is comprised of the same technology as is used in most fuel cell
vehicle applications.
STATIONARY,
BACKUP AND PORTABLE FUEL CELL BENEFITS
- In backup applications, fuel cells
can provide power for critical infrastructure such as communication systems and
water utilities.
- Fuel cells used in materials
handling applications offer a clean and highly efficient alternative to the
current battery solutions.
- Fuel cell systems are designed to
stringent standards developed by the telecommunications industry that qualify
equipment under extreme environmental conditions and requires specific levels
of technological resiliency including temperature extremes, wind-driven rain,
altitude, earthquake and ballistics tolerance.
- Fuel cell technology operates with
very low audible noise, 60dba@1m, in stark contrast to traditional combustion
systems, which typically operate at 70db@7m.
- Our traditional central generation
model for supply of power in the U.S. is failing to meet the needs of a growing
economy with increasing demand for high-quality power. There are weaknesses in
both power generation and transmission and distribution infrastructure that can
best be met with the new paradigm of distributed generation: placing the
generating assets on site, where the energy is needed. Fuel cells will be an
important technology component of our nation’s distributed generation portfolio
as issues of energy security become more critical.
- When fueled by hydrogen from a
renewable energy source such as solar, wind, or hydropower, or if the fuel
source is bio-fuel like ethanol from plant wastes, CO2 emissions are net zero.
- Fuel cells can provide highly
reliable electricity. Some studies estimate that power quality and reliability
issues cost our economy alone as much as $150 billion per year in lost
materials and productivity, while others have reported estimates as high as
$400 billion per year.
- Unlike traditional combustion
technologies, fuel cell systems are designed to require only one preventive
maintenance call per year to ensure full capability and performance.
- Because fuel cells provide
electricity at the site of consumption, they reduce the load on the existing
transmission and distribution system. Siting the fuel cells at the point of
consumption also avoids the line losses (up to 15%) inherent in moving
electricity and provides an alternative to costly and unattractive traditional
power lines. Provides critical backup when grid power is unavailable due to
weather related outages and can carry the load at the site of consumption until
grid power is restored.
A
HYDROGEN ECONOMY
Both stationary and mobile fuel cell systems are the ideal technologies to
transition to a fully sustainable energy future based on hydrogen.
Vehicular and stationary fuel cells, taken together, provide the impetus for
development of a hydrogen infrastructure in the United States and move us to
natural capitalism. This technology, like other innovative transportation
options, is cursed with the "chicken or the egg" question. That is: what
comes first, the infrastructure or the fuel cells? By developing both
stationary and transportation applications with the ability to refuel on a small
scale, demand can be generated by multiple product applications and provide a
stronger incentive to develop a full-scale hydrogen infrastructure. By way
of example, our company is exploring a home refueling station that would fuel,
via hydrogen, the family automobile as well as provide the electricity and heat
for the home. One can imagine the early adopters buying a fuel cell car
and a home refueling station at the same time.
| |