Statement of Jaime Steve, Legislative Director, American Wind Energy Association Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures of the House Committee on Ways and Means April 19, 2007
Chairman Neal and members of
the committee, my name is Jaime Steve and I serve as Legislative Director for
the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) based here in Washington, D.C.
Mr. Chairman, today’s typical
wind turbine can generate as much as two megawatts of electricity, or enough power
to meet the needs of about 540 households. It is also interesting to note that:
- Texas is now the #1 wind-producing State in the
nation, having recently surpassed California which held that claim for
over 20 years.
- The Statue of Liberty’s
torch is powered through a purchase of wind energy.
- Starbucks, Safeway, and
Staples are all purchasing wind-generated electricity.
- Examples of wind energy
jobs include 500 workers building towers at Beaird Industries in Shreveport, LA and another 350 workers building towers at DMI Industries in West Fargo, ND.
- Wind developers pay about
$5,000 per turbine, per year for 20 years in lease payments to
hard-pressed farmers, ranchers and other land owners from Maple Ridge, NY to Abilene, TX. Wind projects also make significant contributions to the local tax base
of many rural communities.
- A single wind turbine
avoids the same amount of carbon dioxide as is emitted by about 4,800
cars.
These examples show that supporting
wind and other forms of clean, renewable energy means creating jobs, spurring rural
economic development, stemming global warming, and enhancing our national
energy security.
And, the best way to invest in renewable energy is through
long-term extensions of the renewable energy tax credits and bonds,
specifically:
1) The
renewable energy Production Tax Credit (or PTC) which expires
December 31, 2008
2) The
existing solar Investment Tax Credit -- with the addition of small wind
systems
used to power homes, farms, and small businesses, and
3) Clean
Renewable Energy Bonds for non-taxpaying, public power entities.
These incentives are needed
because wind energy is still not yet fully cost competitive with mature
electric generation technologies. In fact, over the last two years, wind
energy costs have been increasing, making the Production Tax Credit even more
crucial than before.
First, a thank you to Reps.
Pomeroy and Ramstad for their bill, H.R. 197, aimed at providing a 5-year
extension of the PTC through December 31, 2013. This bill now has 75
cosponsors, ten of whom are members of this panel. I also thank Reps.
Blumenauer and Cole for their bill (H.R. 1772) to open the separate investment
tax credit for solar power systems for use by individual landowners who
purchase small wind systems. The history of these incentives in this committee
clearly shows that support for renewable energy tax credits has always been a
bipartisan issue.
Since 1999, the PTC has
expired and been extended five times – always for short one-or-two-year periods
and more often than not with economically painful periods of expiration between
extensions. The effect has been to create a boom-and-bust cycle that stops us
from achieving further cost reductions and holds back our potential. Simply
stated: when the credit is available, we produce jobs and clean energy … when
it is not available we lose jobs and build very few new projects. Access to a
long-term PTC can break this boom-and-bust cycle, and allow wind energy to
become an even far greater contributor to our energy mix.
In 1998 wind energy produced
enough electricity to power about 500,000 homes and wind was virtually a
California-only industry. Today, Texas has surpassed California as the top
wind energy producing state and high-tech wind turbines are operating in 30
states producing the equivalent amount of electricity needed to power about 3
million American homes – or, about the amount of energy used by the entire
population of the state of Virginia. This growth has been driven in large part
by access to short-term PTC extensions. Imagine what we could do with a
long-term extension.
A long-term PTC would spur increased
development of wind and other renewables, while also creating much-needed manufacturing
jobs, particularly in the Midwest. A long-term extension also would reduce the
cost of wind power to consumers. Industry estimates indicate that a 10-year
PTC would deliver thousands of megawatts of new wind power and a 15 percent
reduction in the cost of electricity produced from wind. A shorter 5-year
extension would deliver about half as much power and about half (roughly 8
percent) of the cost reductions. In a nutshell, a long-term extension would
eliminate the every-other-year turbine manufacturing cycle by allowing large
investments in the supply chain for turbine components. This ability to plan
and invest would create jobs, and reduce costs and stem price increases for
wind turbines, thus lowering energy costs to consumers.
ConclusionMr. Chairman, to keep
providing new jobs, spurring rural economic development and addressing global
warming, the wind industry needs long-term access to renewable energy
production tax credits, investment tax credits and bonds.
We all ask Congress to pass
long-term extensions of these tax credits at full value so that we can keep the
tower factories humming from Shreveport, Louisiana to West Fargo, North Dakota. We’ll also keep making much-needed land rental payments to farmers and ranchers,
from Maple Ridge, NY to Abilene, TX.
Thank you,
___________________________
Jaime Steve, Legislative Director, American Wind Energy
Association
1101 14th Street,
NW 12th Floor
Washington, D.C. 20005
202-383-2506
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background: The U.S. wind energy industry installed over 2,400
megawatts (MW) of new generating capacity in 2006, making wind one of the
largest sources of new power generation in the country and a mainstream option
with which to meet growing electricity demand. One megawatt of wind power
produces enough electricity on average to serve 250 to 300 homes.
AWEA’s annual industry rankings provide a standard reference point for tracking
the growth of wind power in the U.S. The rankings (as of December 31, 2006)
are the following:
Top Five Wind Energy
Producing States
(Expressed in megawatts (MW)
of capacity):
State # of MW
Texas
|
2,768
|
California
|
2,361
|
Iowa
|
936
|
Minnesota
|
895
|
Washington
|
818
|
Texas is firmly established as the leader in wind power
development, with over 2,700 megawatts of new wind generation installed at the
end of 2006, and some 1,000 megawatts currently under construction. Iowa and Minnesota look likely to break the 1,000 MW mark in 2007. Washington will come
close, with the 140-MW Marengo project that is currently under construction
there.
Top Five Largest Wind
Farms
Operating in the U.S. (Size is expressed in Megawatts (MW))
Project
# of MW Project Owner
Horse
Hollow, TX
|
736
|
FPL
Energy
|
Maple
Ridge, NY
|
322
|
PPM
Energy/Horizon Wind Energy
|
Stateline, OR & WA
|
300
|
FPL
Energy
|
King
Mountain, TX
|
281
|
FPL
Energy
|
Sweetwater, TX
|
264
|
Babcock
& Brown/Catamount
|
________________________________________________________________________
Five PTC expirations and
extensions since 1993:
In place: January 1, 1993
through June 30, 1999
1) Credit expired: June 30,
1999
Extended: December 1999
through December 31, 2001 (credit made retroactive to July 1, 2001)
CREDIT UNCERTAIN FOR 6
MONTHS
2) Credit expired: December
31, 2001
Extended: March 2002 through
December 31, 2003 (retroactive to January 1, 2002)
CREDIT UNCERTAIN FOR 3
MONTHS
3) Credit expired: December
31, 2003
Extended: September 2004
through December 31, 2005 (retroactive to January 1, 2004)
CREDIT UNCERTAIN FOR 8
MONTHS
4) Extended: August 2005
through December 31, 2007
FIRST TIME CREDIT EXTENDED
BEFORE EXPIRATION DATE
5) Extended: Oct. 2006
through December 31, 2008
SECOND TIME CREDIT EXTENDED
BEFORE EXPIRATION DATE
|