[Skip navigation]FDA Logo links to FDA home page
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research
  HHS Logo links to Department of Health and Human Services website

FDA Home Page | CDER Home Page | CDER Site Info | Contact CDER | What's New @ CDER

horizonal rule
CDER Home About CDER Drug Information Regulatory Guidance CDER Calendar Specific Audiences CDER Archives
 
Powered by Google
 

Drug Development and Drug Interactions
Possible Models for Decision-Making


Possible Model for Decision Making: CYP-Based Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

Figure 1. CYP-Based Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

CYP-Based Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

NME: New molecular entity

* Additional population pharmacokinetic analysis may assist the overall evaluation.

+ negative results from an in vivo cocktail study would preclude further evaluation to determine whether an NME is an inhibitor or an inducer of a particular CYP enzyme


Possible Models for Decision-Making: P-gp-Based Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

Figure 2. Possible model for decision-making: whether an investigational drug is a substrate for P-gp and whether an in vivo drug interaction study with a P-gp inhibitor is needed.

Reference: Lei Zhang, John M. Strong, Wei Qiu, Lawrence J. Lesko, and Shiew-Mei Huang. Modified from Scientific Perspectives on Drug Transporters and Their Role in Drug Interactions  Mol Pharm. 2006; 3(1), 62-69, Epub Jan 4 2006. [PDF] [external link]

Decision tree to determine whether an investigational drug is a substrate for P-gp and whether an in vivo drug interaction study with a P-gp inhibitor is needed

*For Caco-2 cells, net flux ratio is calculated as (Permeability app, B-A/Permeability app, A-B); For MDR1-overexpressed cell lines, net flux ratio is calculated as ratio of (Permeability app, B-A/Permeability app, A-B) MDR1 to (Permeability app, B-A/Permeability app, A-B,) wild-type.
(a) An acceptable system produces next flux ratios of probe substrates similar to the literature values. A net flux ratio >2 for the investigational drug is a positive signal for further evaluation. Note: there is a concern that this value is too liberal and will lead to too may positive results. An alternative is to use a % value (net flux of investigation drug relative to a probe substrate, such as digoxin).
(b) reduction of the flux ratio significantly (> 50%) or to unity


Possible Model for Decision Making: P-gp Inhibitor and Digoxin Interaction Studies

Figure 3. Possible model for decision-making: whether an investigational drug is an inhibitor for p-gp and whether in vivo drug interaction studies with a P-gp probe substrate, such as digoxin, is needed

Reference: Lei Zhang, John M. Strong, Wei Qiu, Lawrence J. Lesko, and Shiew-Mei Huang. Modified from Scientific Perspectives on Drug Transporters and Their Role in Drug Interactions [PDF] [external link] Mol Pharm. 2006; 3(1), 62-69, Epub Jan 4 2006.

Decision tree to determine whether an investigational drug is an inhibitor for p-gp and whether in vivo drug interaction studies with digoxin are needed

* For Caco-2 cells, net flux ratio is calculated as (Permeability app, B-A/Permeability app, A-B); For MDR1-overexpressed cell lines, net flux ratio is calculated as ratio of (Permeability app, B-A/Permeability app, A-B) MDR1 to (Permeability app, B-A/Permeability app, A-B,) wild-type.

Note that [I] represents the mean steady state Cmax value for total drug (bound and unbound) following administration of the highest proposed clinical dose.

PDF requires the free Adobe Acrobat Reader

Back to Top     Back to Drug Interactions

Date created: May 1, 2006
Date updated: October 11, 2006

horizonal rule