Overview
Second Quarter 2008 Key Findings | |
Net Income | $30.4 billion |
Revenues | $423.4 billion |
Highlights | Major energy companies reported a 1-percent decline in net income relative to second quarter of 2007. However, this also represents a 31-percent increase relative to the second-quarter average for 2003-2007. |
Return on sales (net income ÷ revenue) fell from 10.5 percent to 7.2 percent in the second quarter of 2008 due to the 44 percent increase in revenue. | |
The effects of higher oil and natural gas prices are more than offset by lower worldwide oil production and worldwide refining margins. |
Nineteen major energy companies reported overall net income (excluding unusual items) of $30.4 billion on revenues of $423.4 billion during the second quarter of 2008 (Q208). The level of net income for Q208 was 1-percent lower than in the second quarter of 2007 (Q207) (Table 1), but was 31-percent higher than the second-quarter average for 2003-2007 after adjusting for inflation. However, return on sales (net income รท revenue) fell from 10.5 percent in Q207 to 7.2 percent in Q208 due largely to the 44-percent increase in revenue. Net income for Q208 decreased as the effects of lower worldwide crude oil production, worldwide refining margins, and worldwide refinery throughput, more than offset the effects of higher crude oil and natural gas prices and greater worldwide natural gas production.
Overall, the petroleum line of business (which includes both oil and natural gas production and petroleum refining/marketing) registered a negligible increase in net income between Q207 and Q208. A $12.2-billion (50-percent) increase in worldwide oil and natural gas production net income was almost entirely matched by an 11.9-billion (78-percent) decrease in worldwide refining/marketing net income. All of the lines of business with the exception of domestic and foreign oil and natural gas production (i.e., domestic and foreign refining/marketing, and worldwide gas and power operations, and worldwide chemical operations) generated lower earnings in Q208 than in Q207. (Note: corporate net income and the total net income of the lines of business differ because (1) some items in corporate net income are nontraceable, such as interest expense, and are not allocated to lines of business, and (2) the number of companies reporting line-of-business net income varies.)
|
.
The crude oil price for Q208 increased 86 percent relative to a year earlier while the price of natural gas increased 43 percent. The imported average crude oil price increased from $62.30 per barrel in Q207 to $115.63 per barrel in Q208 (Table 2). (See the current and recent issues of the Short-Term Energy Outlook for an explanation of these price changes and those discussed below.) This is the twenty-second time in the past twenty-four quarters (i.e., five and three-quarters years) that the price of crude oil was higher relative to the year-earlier quarter. (The first and second quarters of 2007 were the only exceptions since the second quarter of 2002.)
Table 2. U.S. Energy Prices and the U.S. Gross Refining Margin | |||
Q207 | Q208 | Percent Change | |
U.S. Energy Pricesa | |||
Imported Average Crude Oil Price ($/barrel) | 62.30 |
115.63 |
85.6 |
Natural Gas Wellhead Price ($/thousand cubic feet) | 6.89 |
9.86 |
43.1 |
U.S. Gross Refining Margin ($/barrel)b | 29.47 |
12.66 |
-57.0 |
a Energy Information
Administration, Short-Term Energy Outlook, (August 12, 2008),
Table 2. b Compiled from data in Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Marketing Monthly, DOE/EIA-380 (Washington, DC), Table 1, Table 4 and Table 5; and Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review, DOE/EIA-0035, (Washington, DC) Table 3.2. Note: The U.S. Gross Refining Margin is the difference between the composite wholesale product price and the composite refiner acquisition cost of crude oil. |
|||
Earnings from worldwide oil and natural gas production operations (i.e., upstream operations) increased 50 percent between Q207 and Q208. Much higher domestic earnings magnified an even greater (in terms of the nominal change) increase in foreign earnings, resulting in an increase of more than $12 billion to $36.4 billion.
Earnings from worldwide refining and marketing operations (i.e., downstream operations) decreased 78 percent between Q207 and Q208 (Table 2) due to lower refining margins, and lower refinery throughput worldwide. Both domestic and foreign earnings were lower in Q208 than a year earlier and resulted in a decrease of almost $12 billion to $3.3 billion (Table 1).
Profits from domestic downstream operations in Q208 were 83 percent lower than in Q207. Putting downward pressure on earnings were the $16.81/per barrel (57 percent) decline in the industry-wide gross margin (Table 2) and a miniscule decline in refinery throughput by the included companies. The net effect of these and other factors was that U.S. refining/marketing earnings of $2 billion in Q208 were about $10 billion lower than in Q207 (Table 1). The performance of the eleven companies that reported U.S. refining/marketing earnings was consistent as all companies reported lower earnings (three of which reported losses) in Q208 than in Q207. Higher crude oil and operating costs, lower marketing margins, reduced product sales, and trading losses were noted in press releases by the companies reporting lower earnings. [Increased losses attributable to the use of derivatives to mitigate crude oil price risk have led to a decreased use of derivatives for at least one of the companies.]
Earnings from foreign downstream operations decreased 60 percent between Q207 and Q208 (Table 1). Downward pressure on earnings from a 2-percent reduction in refinery throughput between Q207 and Q208 (Table 1), was magnified by both lower Asia/Pacific and European refining margins. Asia/Pacific margins were $3.95 per barrel (a fraction of the U.S. decline) lower and margins in Europe were $2.35 per barrel lower. All 5 companies reported lower earnings (three of which reported losses). Factors leading to lower earnings such as higher operating expenses and lower margins were noted in the press releases.
Worldwide Downstream Natural Gas and Power
Worldwide downstream natural gas and power earnings decreased 13 percent (Table 1) due to mark-to-market write-downs. The results of the two companies that reported lower earnings overwhelmed those of the seven companies reporting higher earnings than a year earlier. Lower earnings primarily were attributed to mark-to-market write-downs, with higher operating costs also mentioned. Higher earnings were due to many reasons, including higher natural gas liquids prices received, completion of a liquefied natural gas train, and expansion of operations.
Earnings from chemical operations decreased due to lower margins. All of the six companies reporting results for this line of business recorded lower earnings, resulting in a 55-percent decline in earnings from the majors' chemical operations in Q208 relative to Q207 (Table 1). Approximately 80 percent of the reduction in earnings was due to Exxon Mobil (which accounted for 108 percent of Q208 chemical net income and 72 percent of Q207 net income) and Shell. The major reasons for lower earnings were lower margins and higher operating costs.
About this Report
The "Financial News for Major Energy Companies" is issued quarterly to report recent trends in the financial performance of the major energy companies. These include the respondents to Form EIA-28 (Financial Reporting System (FRS)), with the exception of the FRS companies that do not issue quarterly earnings releases or do not provide separate information for the company's U.S. operations.
To be automatically notified via e-mail of updates to this report and to other Energy Finance products, click here, enter your e-mail address, place a check mark (by left-clicking) in the box beside "Financial and Industry Analysis," and then press the button labeled "subscribe." You will then be notified within an hour of any updates.
Contact:
Neal Davis
neal.davis@eia.doe.gov
Fax: (202) 586-9753