U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 009-02
Prepared in cooperation with the CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS
Download this report as a PDF file (1.47 KB)
Download a free copy of
Acrobat Reader
Significant Findings of Water-Quality Studies and Implications for Cheney Reservoir
Watershed, South-Central Kansas, 1996-2001
Larry M. Pope
CONTENTS
Water-quality issues in the Cheney Reservoir watershed were investigated from 1996-2001 as
part of a cooperative effort between the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the city of
Wichita, Kansas. Water quality in the Cheney Reservoir watershed is important because much of
the population of the area, which includes the Wichita metropolitan area, relies on Cheney
Reservoir as a drinking-water source and for recreational activities. Water-quality studies
conducted during the investigation addressed the transport of important water-quality
constituents that included nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus species), pesticides, bacteria,
and suspended solids. Conclusions drawn for most water-quality studies conducted in the
Cheney Reservoir watershed were the result of samples collected at six surface-water-quality
sampling sites (five upstream and one downstream from Cheney Reservoir) and reservoir-sediment
and watershed-soil studies (fig. 1).
The water-quality studies are documented in the reports referenced in this fact sheet. Reports
of all of these studies are available on the World Wide Web at:
http://ks.water.usgs.gov/Kansas/studies/qw/cheney/
- Mean concentrations of nitrate in streamflow were much less than drinking-water
criteria.
- Mean concentrations of phosphorus in streamflow exceeded the established water-quality
goal at all sampling sites.
- Agricultural activities have accounted for 65 percent of the phosphorus transported to
Cheney Reservoir.
- Substantial reductions in phosphorus transported to Cheney Reservoir may involve a
combination of approaches such as reducing phosphorus application and changes in
land-use, land-management, and agricultural practices.
- Median concentrations of pesticides in streamflow were less than drinking-water
criteria.
- Numbers of fecal coliform bacteria in streams were large during runoff but were less
than water-quality criteria in Cheney Reservoir.
- Sediment accumulation in Cheney Reservoir was less than expected.
- Mean concentrations of nitrate were small compared to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA) drinking-water criterion of 10 mg/L. Among the five
surface-water-quality sampling sites upstream from Cheney Reservoir, mean concentrations
of nitrate ranged from 0.43 (sampling site 2, fig. 1) to 1.6 mg/L (milligrams per liter) (sampling site 5) in surface-water
samples collected during 1997-2000. However, mean concentrations of nitrate in water from
four of the five sites were larger than the national mean background concentration of 0.6
mg/L, which may indicate that nitrate concentrations in streamflow in the Cheney Reservoir
watershed are enriched as a result of agricultural activities (Milligan and Pope, 2001).
- Mean concentrations of total phosphorus exceeded water-quality goals. The
long-term mean stream-water-quality goal of 0.10 mg/L for total phosphorus established by
the Cheney Reservoir Watershed Task Force Committee was exceeded by mean concentrations of
total phosphorus in water samples collected during 1997˜2000 from all five
surface-water-quality sampling sites upstream from Cheney Reservoir
(fig. 2). These mean concentrations ranged from 0.23
(sampling site 2, fig. 1) to 0.50
mg/L (sampling site 5) and were substantially larger than the 0.10-mg/L national mean
background concentration of total phosphorus in streams, which indicates enrichment by
agricultural activities or large natural concentrations in soils (Milligan and Pope,
2001). Historically (1965-98), however, the mean total phosphorus concentration in the
surface-water inflow to Cheney Reservoir was 0.76 mg/L as calculated on the basis of
phosphorus deposited in the reservoir sediment (Mau, 2001). The implication of these
relatively large mean phosphorus concentrations is that phosphorus input to Cheney
Reservoir is sufficient to produce algal blooms (excessive growth of algae), possible
taste-and-odor problems in treated drinking water, and potentially could reduce the
aesthetic and recreational appeal of the reservoir.
- Phosphorus concentrations have been increasing over time. An analysis of
reservoir bottom sediment indicated an increasing trend (since construction of the
reservoir in 1965) in total phosphorus concentrations in water from the Cheney Reservoir
watershed. This trend probably is related to human activities such as fertilizer use in
crop production, which more than doubled between 1965 and 1996 (Mau, 2001).
- The amount of phosphorus annually transported from the watershed varied. Annual
fluctuations in the amount of phosphorus transported by streams in the watershed resulted,
in large part, from variability in precipitation and resulting runoff. Wetter years
produced more phosphorus transport. Most of the annual phosphorus transport to Cheney
Reservoir occurred during runoff (high-flow) conditions. For example, during 1997-2000, 72
percent of the phosphorus transport in streamflow at sampling site 4
(fig. 1) occurred during runoff (Pope and
others, 2002). The estimated mean annual phosphorus yield for the entire Cheney Reservoir
watershed for 1997-98 was 0.20 pound per acre (Pope and Milligan, 2000). Historically
(1965-98), however, the mean annual phosphorus yield of the watershed was estimated at
0.38 pound per acre (Mau, 2001). Estimated mean annual yields from watersheds of other
reservoirs in Kansas have ranged from 0.02 to 1.76 pounds per acre.
- Agricultural activities accounted for 65 percent of the phosphorus transported to
Cheney Reservoir. A comparison of the historical (1965-98) mean concentrations of
phosphorus in sediment transported to Cheney Reservoir with the mean concentration of
phosphorus in soil from 43 nonagricultural sites (fig. 1) in the Cheney Reservoir watershed indicated that agricultural
activities increased the transport of phosphorus into Cheney Reservoir 2.9 times greater
than that expected under natural conditions of phosphorus in soil. It was estimated that
during 1965-98, 8.4 million pounds of phosphorus were transported to Cheney Reservoir.
Ninety-two (92) percent of this phosphorus was deposited in the bottom sediment of the
reservoir. The amount of phosphorus transported to Cheney Reservoir related to
agricultural activities (65 percent of the total) was calculated from the total amount
transported (8.4 million pounds) and the agricultural-enrichment factor (2.9). The
implication of this large percentage of agriculturally related phosphorus is that a large
potential exists for reducing phosphorus transport to Cheney Reservoir by changing
agricultural activities (Pope and others, 2002).
- Substantial reduction in phosphorus transported to Cheney Reservoir may involve a
combination of approaches such as reducing phosphorus application and changes in land-use,
land-management, and agricultural practices. To determine if reductions in phosphorus
application alone would reduce mean concentrations of total phosphorus in streams to
acceptable levels (equal to or less than 0.10 mg/L), the agriculturally affected long-term
(1997-2000) mean concentrations presented in figure
2 were divided by the agricultural-enrichment factor (2.9). These calculations
produced estimated long-term mean concentrations of total phosphorus under natural
concentrations of phosphorus in watershed soil (fig.
2). These estimated concentrations indicate that even under natural concentrations of
phosphorus in watershed soil two (sampling sites 3 and 5, fig. 1) of the five surface-water-quality sampling sites in the Cheney
Reservoir watershed still may not meet the long-term water-quality goal of 0.10 mg/L. The
implication of this finding is that in order to meet water-quality goals for total
phosphorus in the watershed, a combination of approaches such as reducing phosphorus
application and changes in land-use, land-management, and agricultural practices may be
involved (Pope and others, 2002).
- The occurrence of pesticides in surface water of the Cheney Reservoir watershed is
widespread. At least one pesticide was detected in 99 percent of the streamflow
samples collected between 1997 and 1999. Fifteen herbicides, one herbicide metabolite, and
six insecticides were detected in streamflow samples from the Cheney Reservoir watershed.
The herbicides alachlor, atrazine, and metolachlor were detected in 61, 99, and 96
percent, respectively, of all streamflow samples (Milligan and Pope, 2000).
- Median concentrations of pesticides generally were small and less than
drinking-water criteria. Median concentrations of alachlor and atrazine were less than
their respective Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) established by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA) (fig.
3). An MCL has not been established for metolachlor. The variability in median
concentrations of alachlor, atrazine, and metolachlor among the six surface-water-quality
sampling sites probably is the result of variations in pesticide usage, amount of
precipitation and runoff, topography, agricultural practices, and soil characteristics
such as particle-size composition, porosity, and erodibility among the subwatershed areas
represented by the sampling sites (Milligan and Pope, 2000).
- Potential adverse human health risks appear small. The implication of long-term
exposure to small concentrations of pesticides in most streamflow samples for the
population that relies on Cheney Reservoir as a drinking-water source is not of great
concern on the basis of current (2001) water-quality criteria. However, the long-term
effects of small concentrations of pesticides on aquatic life are not well known and may
be an issue within the watershed (Milligan and Pope, 2000).
- Bacteria of fecal origin are common in streams of the Cheney Reservoir watershed.
The sanitary quality of water and its use as a public drinking-water supply and for
recreation were evaluated on the basis of fecal coliform bacteria densities. Fecal
coliform bacteria were detected in streamflow samples from all surface-water-quality
sampling sites in the watershed (fig. 4) (Mau
and Pope, 1999).
- Large fecal coliform densities are common in streams during runoff conditions.
Relatively large median fecal coliform densities were associated with runoff conditions at
sampling sites upstream from Cheney Reservoir, and the median density at sampling site 3
was substantially larger than the 2,000-col/100 mL (colonies per 100 milliliters of water)
water-quality criterion for secondary contact recreation (such as wading and fishing)
established by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment
(fig. 4). In contrast, median densities
during base-flow (low-flow) conditions were substantially less than the 2,000-col/100 mL
criterion in water from all five surface-water-quality sampling sites upstream from Cheney
Reservoir. Fecal coliform densities are typically much greater in streams during runoff
conditions because of nonpoint-source contributions from the watershed. These
contributions can originate from deposition of fecal material by livestock and wildlife or
from the use of manure as a soil amendment (Mau and Pope, 1999).
- Fecal coliform densities were much less in Cheney Reservoir than in its tributary
streams. The median fecal coliform density in water samples from the outflow of Cheney
Reservoir (sampling site 6, fig. 1)
for 1997-98 was about 11 col/100 mL, substantially less than the 200-col/100 mL
water-quality criterion for primary contact recreation (such as swimming)
(fig. 4). The relatively small median
density of fecal coliform bacteria in the outflow from Cheney Reservoir is attributed to
the fact that bacteria transported into the reservoir by tributary streams are subject to
die off and predation by other organisms. The physical process of dilution by reservoir
water and deposition also play a role in decreasing bacterial densities in reservoir
outflow. The implication of the relatively small median density of fecal coliform bacteria
is that water flowing out of the reservoir generally is of acceptable sanitary quality for
swimming and other contact activities (Mau and Pope, 1999).
- Deposition of suspended solids in Cheney Reservoir was less than expected. One
of the principal concerns with the transport of suspended solids (sediment) into Cheney
Reservoir is a loss of reservoir storage capacity. Cheney Reservoir has a
sediment-trapping efficiency of 99 percent (Pope and others, 2002). Decreases in reservoir
storage capacity can affect reservoir allocations used for flood control, drinking-water
supplies, recreation, and wildlife habitat. Reservoirs in Kansas commonly were designed to
provide 100 years of sediment deposition. As of 1998, 34 years of sediment deposition had
occurred in Cheney Reservoir, which equates to 34 percent of the design life of the
reservoir. However, only 27 percent of the allocated sediment storage capacity had been
used. The implication of this finding is that although sediment is effectively trapped in
Cheney Reservoir, it is accumulating at a rate less than expected, which map extend the
useful life of the reservoir beyond 100 years. Also, this finding may be an indication
that efforts to reduce erosion (transport of sediment) in the watershed have been
effective (Mau, 2001).
- Christensen, V.G., and Pope, L.M., 1997, Occurrence of dissolved solids, nutrients,
atrazine, and fecal coliform bacteria during low flow in the Cheney Reservoir watershed,
south-central Kansas, 1996: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report
97-4153, 13 p.
- Mau, D.P., 2001, Sediment deposition and trends and transport of phosphorus and other
chemical constituents, Cheney Reservoir watershed, south-central Kansas: U.S. Geological
Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4085, 40 p.
- Mau, D.P., and Pope, L.M., 1999, Occurrence of fecal coliform bacteria in the Cheney
Reservoir watershed, south-central Kansas, 1997-99: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet
170-99, 4 p.
- Milligan, C.R., and Pope, L.M., 2000, Occurrence of pesticides in streams of the
Cheney Reservoir watershed, south-central Kansas, 1997-99: U.S. Geological Survey Fact
Sheet 096-00, 4 p.
- ______2001, Occurrence of phosphorus, nitrate, and suspended solids in streams of the
Cheney Reservoir watershed, south-central Kansas, 1997-2000: U.S. Geological Survey
Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4199, 18 p.
- Pope, L.M., 1998, Watershed trend analysis and water-quality assessment using
bottom-sediment cores from Cheney Reservoir, south-central, Kansas, 1997-98: U.S.
Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4227, 24 p.
- Pope, L.M., and Milligan, C.R., 2000, Preliminary assessment of phosphorus transport
in the Cheney Reservoir watershed, south-central Kansas, 1997-98: U.S. Geological Survey
Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4023, 29 p.
- Pope, L.M., Milligan, C.R., and Mau, D.P., 2002, Historical contributions of
phosphorus from natural and agricultural sources and implications for stream water quality,
Cheney Reservoir watershed, south-central Kansas: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources
Investigations Report 02-4021, 25 p.
For World Wide Web access to Cheney Reservoir watershed publications:
http://ks.water.usgs.gov/Kansas/studies/qw/cheney
or contact:
District Chief
U.S. Geological Survey
4821 Quail Crest Place
Lawrence, Kansas 66049-3839
(785) 842-9909
email: dc_ks@usgs.gov
|