National Cancer Institute National Cancer Institute
U.S. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute
NCI Home Cancer Topics Clinical Trials Cancer Statistics Research & Funding News About NCI

Clinical Trial Results

Summaries of Newsworthy Clinical Trial Results

< Back to Main

    Posted: 03/26/2008
Page Options
Print This Page  Print This Page
E-Mail This Document  E-Mail This Document
Browse by Cancer Type
Breast Cancer

Lung Cancer

Prostate Cancer

More Results
Search Trial Results

    Search  
Quick Links
Director's Corner
Updates from the Director

Dictionary of Cancer Terms
Cancer-related terms

NCI Drug Dictionary
Definitions, names, and links

Funding Opportunities
Research and training

NCI Publications
Order/download free booklets

Advisory Boards and Groups
Information, meetings, reports

Science Serving People
Learn more about NCI

Español
Información en español
NCI Highlights
Virtual and Standard Colonoscopy Both Accurate

Denosumab May Help Prevent Bone Loss

Past Highlights
Related Pages
Search for Clinical Trials
NCI's PDQ® registry of cancer clinical trials.

Breast Cancer Home Page
NCI's gateway for information about breast cancer.

Aromatase Inhibitors
A collection of information about aromatase inhibitors, a hormone therapy used in the treatment of some women with breast cancer.
Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, and Bone Loss on the ATAC Trial

Key Words

Breast cancer, bone loss, anastrozole (Arimidex®), tamoxifen (Nolvadex®). (Definitions of many terms related to cancer can be found in the Cancer.gov Dictionary.)

Summary

Postmenopausal women taking the drug anastrozole (Arimidex®) to prevent a recurrence of breast cancer suffered more bone loss than women taking tamoxifen (Nolvadex®), even while anastrozole provided better protection against relapse, according to a substudy of a major clinical trial comparing the two drugs. Doctors and patients need to consider all risks and benefits when deciding on the best adjuvant approach for women with hormone-positive, early-stage breast cancer.

Source

Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 1, 2008 (see the journal abstract).
(J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 1; 26(7): 1051-58)

Background

Postmenopausal women with hormone-positive, early-stage breast cancer have a number of medical options to lower the risk of a relapse after their initial treatment. Among these options are tamoxifen and various aromatase inhibitors (AIs), such as anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane.

In addition to their potential benefits, these drugs have side effects that must be considered in the context of the patient’s overall health. For example, most women begin to lose bone density at menopause, which puts them at risk of osteoporosis. AIs such as anastrozole, it turns out, tend to cause bone loss. Tamoxifen protects against bone loss but also raises the risk of endometrial cancer and blood clot disorders, among other things.

The Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) study was a double-blinded, phase III clinical trial in which postmenopausal women with hormone-positive, early-stage breast cancer were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. One received tamoxifen, another anastrozole (one of the AIs) , and a third group received a combination of the two. The combination group was discontinued when no benefit was seen at 33 months; these women were offered the chance to switch to one of the remaining two groups.

In 2005, ATAC researchers reported that anastrozole was better than tamoxifen at preventing breast cancer recurrence (see the related story). What follows is a summary of data from a prospective substudy of the ATAC trial concerned specifically with bone loss.

The Study

Of the 9,366 postmenopausal women enrolled in the original ATAC study, 108 completed the substudy reported here. Fifty-seven had been randomly assigned to the anastrozole-only group and 51 to the tamoxifen-only group. The substudy’s goal was to see how anastrozole and tamoxifen affected bone mineral density in the hip and the lumbar spine (lower back). Measurements were taken when the study began, and again at one, two, and five years.

The substudy’s principal investigator was Richard Eastell, M.D., of the University of Sheffield, England.

Results

At the five-year mark, women in the substudy’s tamoxifen group had actually gained bone mineral density: 2.77 percent to their lumbar spine and 0.74 percent to their hip. All gains occurred in the first two years and did not increase over the next three.

Women in the substudy receiving anastrozole for five years lost a median of 6.08 percent of bone mineral density from the lumbar spine and 7.24 percent from the hip. The spinal bone loss was faster during the first two years, whereas loss from the hip occurred at a steady rate.

When the substudy began, just under half of the women in each group had osteopenia (bone loss less severe than osteoporosis). Of these women, four from the anastrozole group progressed to osteoporosis during the five-year study period, compared to one woman from the tamoxifen group. Among women with normal bone density before the study began, 14 from the anastrozole group developed osteopenia, compared to three from the tamoxifen group.

Comments

Based on ATAC and trials with other AIs such as letrozole and exemestane, AIs are becoming the standard of care to prevent recurrence of early-stage breast cancer in this population. However, these cancer treatments do accelerate bone loss, says Jo Anne Zujewski, M.D., head of Breast Cancer Therapeutics with the National Cancer Institute’s Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis. “Bone health is very important in this population, since it is estimated that half of all women over age 50 will suffer a fracture from osteoporosis. One in four of those will become disabled as a result, and one in five who break a hip die within a year.”

Fortunately, pre-existing bone loss “may represent a preventable and treatable condition. writes Eastell, Zujewski agrees.“Bisphosphonate drugs such as pamidronate and zoledronic acid are effective therapies for maintaining bone density,” she says.

“There is no single approach that is best for all women in the adjuvant treatment of hormone-positive, early-stage breast cancer,” says Zujewski. Ongoing trials will help to determine the best course for different groups of women. Patients should discuss the potential risk and benefits of any recommended treatment course with their doctor.

Back to TopBack to Top


A Service of the National Cancer Institute
Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health USA.gov