IMPORT RELATED ISSUES

Subsidies
  • China has agreed to eliminate, upon accession, all subsidies on industrial goods that are prohibited under WTO rules, i.e., subsidies contingent upon export performance (“export subsidies”) and subsidies contingent upon the use of domestic over imported goods (“import substitution subsidies”).
  • China has agreed that, in identifying and measuring the amount of certain subsidies provided to Chinese enterprises, such as preferential government equity investments and loans, WTO Members may turn to foreign or other market-based criteria when internal Chinese benchmarks are inappropriate.
  • Special rules also govern the actionability/countervailability of subsidies provided to state-owned enterprises, in both WTO enforcement proceedings and national countervailing duty proceedings.
    • Under standard WTO rules, a subsidy is actionable/countervailable only when it is provided to a “specific” enterprise or industry or group of enterprises or industries within the jurisdiction of the subsidizing authority.
    • Under the terms of China’s accession, subsidies that are provided predominately or in disproportionately large amounts to state-owned enterprises will be considered “specific,” even if such enterprises represent a broad and diverse cross-section of Chinese industries.
  • The United States will now be able to use WTO enforcement proceedings, to ensure that China’s subsidies are consistent with WTO disciplines.
Antidumping
  • China has agreed that the United States (and other WTO members) may continue to apply its non-market economy methodology for measuring dumping in antidumping investigations of imports from China for the first 15 years following accession. 
  • China continues to have the opportunity to demonstrate that market conditions prevail in its economy as a whole or in a particular industry, but any such demonstration must be made to the satisfaction of the investigating authority.
  • With regard to its own antidumping regime, China has agreed to bring it into conformity with WTO rules, including in any review or refund proceedings involving antidumping measures imposed prior to China’s accession.
  • Furthermore, China has agreed to initiate sunset reviews for all outstanding antidumping measures no later than five years after the date of their imposition. Under standard WTO rules, China would only have been obligated to initiate such sunset reviews within five years of its accession to the WTO.
Transitional China-Specific Safeguard Mechanism
  • China's accession agreement includes a unique, China-specific safeguard mechanism allowing a WTO Member to restrain increasing imports from China that disrupt its market.
  • This mechanism can be applied to any type of product, i.e., industrial goods, including textiles and apparel, and agricultural goods, and will be available for 12 years after accession.
  • China can agree bilaterally to restrain its exports (an action that is not permitted under the WTO Agreement on Safeguards), or a WTO Member can act unilaterally to limit imports to the extent necessary to prevent or address the market disruption. 
  • China can retaliate in response to the use of this safeguard mechanism under special circumstances.
    • If a safeguard measure based on a relative increase in imports has been in effect for more than two years, China may impose similar restrictions on the WTO Member applying the measure.
    • If a safeguard measure based on an absolute increase in imports has been in effect for more than three years, China may impose similar restrictions on the WTO Member applying the measure.
  • In critical circumstances where delay would cause damage that would be difficult to repair, provisional relief can be taken immediately based on a preliminary determination of market disruption or threat.  Such action may precede bilateral consultations and last for up to 200 days.
  • The China-specific safeguard restricts imports from China only, rather than requiring restrictions of imports from all WTO Members as provided in the Safeguards Agreement.
  • If a WTO Member considers that an action, taken by another WTO Member under the China-specific safeguard provision, causes or threatens to cause significant diversions of trade into its market, it may take action to the extent necessary to prevent or remedy such diversions.

December 2001
Department of Commerce
International Trade Administration
Back to top