Brero
Construction, Inc., 1997-BCA-4 and 1999-BCA-2 (ALJ Sept. 27, 1999)
U.S. Department of
Labor
Board of Contract Appeals 800 K Street, NW, Suite 400-N Washington, DC 20001-
8002
September 27, 1999
Case Nos.: 1997-BCA-4, 1999-BCA-2
Appeal of
BRERO CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Contract No.: E-4098-3-00-82-20
RULING ON APPELLANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS
TO INTERROGATORIES, REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
OF DOCUMENTS, AND REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
On August 31, 1999, Appellant filed a Motion To Compel Answers to
Interrogatories, Request for Production of Documents, and Requests for Admissions under cover of a letter
dated August 27, 1999. The First Set of Interrogatories and other requests had been transmitted to
Respondent by letter dated July 8, 1999. In substance, Appellant complains that the Contracting Officer
has not responded to the interrogatories by the due date of August 9, 1999, but instead filed a Motion To
Stay Response to Appellant's Discovery, which has not been granted, so that the responses sought are long
overdue. Appellant asserts that it is prejudiced by the failure to answer the discovery requests. The
particular relief that Appellant requests is that the Board issue an order directing the Contracting Officer
to respond to the interrogatories, and produce copies of documents requested. Appellant also requests
an order deeming Appellant's requests for admissions to be admitted. Appellant's objection to the
Contracting Officer's motion to stay its responses is premised on its contention that its responses to the
Contracting Officer's discovery requests have been sufficient and appropriate, and that the Contracting
Officer's request represents abuse of discovery process.
The Contracting Officer's Motion to Stay Response to Appellant's Discovery filed
July 22, 1999, under cover letter of even date, requests a stay of its response to Appellant's discovery until
a decision has been issued on the Contracting Officer's Motion To Compel Responses to Interrogatories
which was filed on May 14, 1999. That motion was filed because the Contracting Officer deemed the
Appellant's responses to the interrogatories to be substantially deficient for reasons specified. The
Contracting Officer also complains that Appellant's response to Respondent's request for admissions was
not signed and was untimely. The Contracting Officer avers that Appellant has reviewed the DOL files
related to the contract and that the Contracting Officer has forwarded to Appellant copies of the documents
which Appellant had not previously reviewed, including those previously withheld on the grounds of
privilege. The Contracting Officer suggests that the manner in which the Appellant is allowed to answer
his interrogatories would affect the manner of the Contacting Officer's response to Appellant's
interrogatories. Consequently, the Contracting Officer has requested a stay of his response until thirty days
after the Board's disposition of the Contracting Officer's Motion to Compel.
[Page 2]
An order requiring the Appellant to respond appropriately to the Contacting Officer's
interrogatories is being issued concurrently with this ruling. Therefore, the Contracting Officer is directed
to answer the Appellant's First Set of Interrogatories, and Request for Admissions as soon as practicable,
but in such manner as to be delivered to Appellant not later than Friday, October 8, 1999. The Contracting
Officer's Motion To Stay his response is granted to the date of this order, and otherwise denied.
Appellant's Request for Production of Documents has been dealt with concurrently but separately.
Appellant's motion for an order effecting the requested admissions, and for other relief as set forth in its
objection to the Contracting Officer's motion is denied.
So ordered.
EDWARD TERHUNE MILLER
Member, Board of Contract Appeals