Fred Kamara

October 28, 2002

Finding solutions to problems is a very laudable venture. However, creating a problem in the guise of solving one where none exists in the first place is absolutely inappropriate, and a total waste of human, financial and material resources which could be more beneficially utilized elsewhere. This holds true on the question of accessibility or "right of way". Without any doubt, the question of access is of great importance to all, and more especially to people with disabilities, including the blind. However, making general assumptions without carrying out appropriate studies to assess, evaluate and determine real need, with the full and active participation of target groups would be tantamount to prescribing the wrong medication for the wrong patient.

For instance, assuming that audible pedestrian signals should be placed at all major intersections to help blind pedestrians would be utterly misguided if such an assumption is not supported by evidence of a felt need for such a provision in a given area. Even in the event of such a fixture being deemed necessary, the question of type of fixture and precise location should be taken into serious account.

In otherwords, the question of accessibility has to be viewed primarily from the point of view of the target group(s), with respect to what type of device or structure may be deemed necessary, and where and how it could be appropriately located without creating any obstruction for anyone.

It would therefore be most advisable for the Access Board to carefully examine and seriously consider all the ramifications of erecting structures or placing devices where they may prove to be a liability rather than an asset to enhance accessibility for persons with disabilities.


Fred Kamara