skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 17, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter

Pate v. Thomas Poultry, ARB No. 01-029, ALJ No. 2000-STA-51 (ARB Mar. 22, 2001)


U.S. Department of LaborAdministrative Review Board
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210
DOL
Seal

ARB CASE NO. 01-029
ALJ CASE NO. 00-STA-51
DATE: March March 22, 2001

In the Matter of :

DAVID PATE,
    COMPLAINANT,

    v.

THOMAS POULTRY,
    RESPONDENT.

BEFORE: THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD

Appearances:
For the Complainant:
   
David Pate, Pro se,
      Jasper, Alabama

For the Respondent:
    Richard E. Smith, Esq.,
      Christian & Small, LLP, Birmingham, Alabama

FINAL DECISION AND ORDER

   David Pate filed a complaint with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), alleging that he had been terminated in violation of the employee protection provision of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA), 49 U.S.C.A. §31105 (West 1997). Following an investigation, OSHA determined that the case had no merit. Pate objected to that determination and requested a hearing before a departmental Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). At the hearing Pate informed the ALJ that he had been unable to obtain counsel and requested additional time to do so. The ALJ granted that request and postponed the hearing. However, prior to the date of the rescheduled hearing Pate notified the ALJ that he still was not able to obtain counsel, and requested that the hearing "be cancelled [and] dismissed."


[Page 2]

   On January 24, 2001, the ALJ issued a Recommended Order of Dismissal. Relying upon 29 C.F.R. §18.39(b)(2000) -- which provides that "a request for hearing may be dismissed upon its abandonment or settlement by the party or parties who have filed it . . ." the ALJ granted Pate's request and dismissed Pate's objections and request for a hearing.

   The case is now before the Board pursuant to the automatic review procedures of the STAA implementing regulations. 29 C.F.R. §§1978.109(a) and (c)(1). Pursuant to Complainant's request and for the reasons stated by the ALJ we DISMISS this case.

   SO ORDERED.

       PAUL GREENBERG
       Chair

       CYNTHIA L. ATTWOOD
       Member

       RICHARD A. BEVERLY
       Alternate Member



Phone Numbers