skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 17, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Davis-Bacon Act
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
North Warning System (NWS) Alaskan Communications Systems, ARB No. 96-166 (ARB Sept. 25, 1996)


U.S. Department of Labor
Administrative Review Board
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210

ARB Case No. 96-166
DATED: September 25, 1996

In the Matter of:

NORTH WARNING SYSTEM (NWS)
ALASKAN COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CONTRACT NO. F19628-92-C-0176

BEFORE: THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

    This matter is before the Board pursuant to the Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (DBA) and 29 C.F.R. Part 7. On September 18, 1996, the Administrator, Wage and Hour Division (Administrator) filed a motion to dismiss this case with prejudice. In support of the motion to dismiss with prejudice, counsel for the Administrator has averred the following facts, which are supported by the record before the Board.

    On June 13, 1996, the Wage and Hour Division issued a ruling letter to the effect that the DBA applied to construction work under the above referenced contract. The ruling letter was issued to the contracting agency, the U.S. Department of the Air Force, Electronic Systems Center (Air Force or Petitioner). On July 12, 1996, the Air Force filed a petition for review with this Board, seeking review of the Wage and Hour Division's June 13, 1996 final ruling letter. At that time, the Air Force requested an extension of time to and including August 21, 1996 within which to file a statement in support of the Petition for Review. The Board granted this request.

    By August 21, 1996, Petitioner had not filed a statement in support of the Petition for Review. Rather, on that date, the Air Force sent a memorandum to the Wage and Hour Division. The substance of that memorandum was that the Air Force refused to


[Page 2]

comply with the Wage and Hour Division's ruling letter, which, as noted, found that construction work under the contract was covered by the DBA and, further, directed the Air Force to retroactively incorporate the prevailing wage provisions of the DBA in the contract.

    Counsel for the Administrator avers that on September 6, 1996, the Office of the Solicitor was orally advised by Petitioner that the August 21, 1996 correspondence did not constitute an appeal of the June 13, 1996 ruling letter. Moreover, it is averred, Petitioner orally advised counsel for the Administrator that the Air Force did not intend to appeal the ruling.

    On September 10, 1996, counsel for the Air Force confirmed the content of the September 6, 1996 conversation, stating in a letter to counsel for the Administrator that:

. . . the Air Force respectfully declines to amend the NWS Alaskan Communication System contract to retroactively incorporate Davis[-]Bacon Act provisions which the Air Force has reasonably determined are not applicable.[1]

    Based on the foregoing procedural history in this matter, the Board deems the Air Force to have abandoned its appeal. Accordingly, it is hereby

    Ordered that the Board's Notice of Appeal and Order Establishing Briefing Schedule is rescinded. It is, further Ordered that this matter is dismissed with prejudice and that the Wage and Hour Division's ruling letter dated June 13, 1996 (copy attached) is the final agency action of the United States Department of Labor.

    SO ORDERED.

       DAVID A. O'BRIEN
       Chair

       KARL J. SANDSTROM
       Member

       JOYCE D. MILLER
       Alternate Member[2]



Phone Numbers